Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

This would be a huge win to keep him on campus, something to really get excited about. Probably wouldn't be able to find a portal transfer of his caliber. We really need to appreciate these guys while we have them.

  • Hook 'Em 5
Posted
4 minutes ago, Burnt Orange Horn said:

Arch's impact on revenue sharing is minimal.  He is getting plenty from NIL endorsements.

🤘🏻🤘🏼🤘🤘🏽🤘🏾🤘🏿

In normal situation a QB like Arch would ask for 3 or 4 million... don't think he's asking nearly that much but obviously I have no knowledge about it

  • Hook 'Em 1
Posted
2 hours ago, diegozanna20 said:

In normal situation a QB like Arch would ask for 3 or 4 million... don't think he's asking nearly that much but obviously I have no knowledge about it

I know for a fact that Arch doesn't accept any NIL $$$ from the school/collectives, etc. Same as Quinn. His NIL is all private deals. 

  • Hook 'Em 2
Posted
18 minutes ago, TXFF said:

I know for a fact that Arch doesn't accept any NIL $$$ from the school/collectives, etc. Same as Quinn. His NIL is all private deals. 

For the exposure that the brand gives you no *starting* Texas QB should take any money from the university. You can make millions off of deals alone and you can have the chance to have a better team around you

  • Hook 'Em 4
Posted
3 hours ago, Paul L said:

I have never been to a city where people can “drive”

Every outsider in every city in America is from Driver Utopia, USA.

Also, have you ever noticed that wherever you live, everyone says "If you don't like the weather in So-and-So, just wait an  hour.  It will change."

(It's almost like every place in the world has weather patterns)

  • Hook 'Em 3
Posted
1 hour ago, Casey67 said:

Every outsider in every city in America is from Driver Utopia, USA.

Also, have you ever noticed that wherever you live, everyone says "If you don't like the weather in So-and-So, just wait an  hour.  It will change."

(It's almost like every place in the world has weather patterns)

The weather quote is so overused.  It drives me nuts.  

  • Hook 'Em 3
  • Haha 1
Posted
On 12/12/2025 at 1:23 PM, NothinButDaHorns34 said:

People wanna fire flood yet we got ANOTHER first round offensive left tackle on campus and how many years did we go without any of those? Over a decade? I understand the mismanagement by sark and flood, But flood earned the right here to get it fixed. 

I don't understand this logic. Imagine an NBA team having multiple all star players and missing the playoffs. Would you argue that's a sign of good coaching? I don't think so. Under Flood, the OL as a whole has been less than the sum of its parts. He deserves credit for developing Goosby, Christian Jones, etc. But ultimately, Flood should be evaluated based on the performance of the OL as a group. By that metric, he has been mediocre at best. 

  • Hook 'Em 1
  • Haha 2
Posted
3 minutes ago, Texasrocks said:

I don't understand this logic. Imagine an NBA team having multiple all star players and missing the playoffs. Would you argue that's a sign of good coaching? I don't think so. Under Flood, the OL as a whole has been less than the sum of its parts. He deserves credit for developing Goosby, Christian Jones, etc. But ultimately, Flood should be evaluated based on the performance of the OL as a group. By that metric, he has been mediocre at best. 

One year ago we had one of the top offensive lines in the country… rough crowd… now I agree, if we continue to struggle on the field then draft picks don’t matter, but an off year where we improved as the year went on isn’t a reason to fire a guy who has a history of success.

  • Hook 'Em 3
Posted
4 minutes ago, dfwHorn said:

One year ago we had one of the top offensive lines in the country… rough crowd… now I agree, if we continue to struggle on the field then draft picks don’t matter, but an off year where we improved as the year went on isn’t a reason to fire a guy who has a history of success.

They were at good pass blocking last year, but weren't particularly good run blockers. I'd still argue they underperformed given the talent and experience level that Flood had to work with. 

  • Hook 'Em 1
Posted
56 minutes ago, Texasrocks said:

I don't understand this logic. Imagine an NBA team having multiple all star players and missing the playoffs. Would you argue that's a sign of good coaching? I don't think so. Under Flood, the OL as a whole has been less than the sum of its parts. He deserves credit for developing Goosby, Christian Jones, etc. But ultimately, Flood should be evaluated based on the performance of the OL as a group. By that metric, he has been mediocre at best. 

Ahhhh gosh. It’s ALWAYS the non OG’s. The ignore feature is heaven sent. 

  • Hook 'Em 1

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.