Longhorn Posted 2 hours ago Posted 2 hours ago Perhaps Im wrong, but almost everything about the defense seems to be on so much better/stronger footing than the offense. More stars performing well Better overall performance Better recruiting Better quality depth Better coaching Better game planning I don't think its just the old adage that defense ramps up earlier/quicker than offense. I think there is something deeper, but Im not sure. Would love to hear your thoughts (not your insults for daring to have an honest conversation) Thx Quote
Bunk Moreland Posted 1 hour ago Posted 1 hour ago I would add more experienced depth across the board. Lots of young players trying to grow up on offense right now. But I think the rest of the factors you identified are also accurate. Quote
Assistant Regional Manager Posted 1 hour ago Posted 1 hour ago Defense- 8 returning starters (Simmons, Guilbeau, Muhammad, McDonald, Taaffe, Lefau, Hill, Burke, Moore). Offense- 3 returning starters, two of which aren't even playing this weekend (Wisner, Moore). DJ Campbell is the only starter this weekend who also started the Ohio State game last January. It's been two games. Let it play out. Quote
JKSmith Posted 1 hour ago Posted 1 hour ago (edited) I believe that the defense swaps way more personnel in and out compared to the offense. Just takes offense more legit game time to catch up. Edited 1 hour ago by JKSmith 1 Quote
harveycmd Posted 1 hour ago Posted 1 hour ago The defense is more experienced and there's been more investment in the defense over the last couple of years. 1 Quote
harveycmd Posted 1 hour ago Posted 1 hour ago Better enjoy this defense. We're losing seven to eight starter level guys: Brevard, Shaw, Burke, Hill, Gilbeau, Taaffe, Muhammed, and maybe McDonald. 2 Quote
Dread-headed Texan Posted 1 hour ago Posted 1 hour ago 15 minutes ago, harveycmd said: Better enjoy this defense. We're losing seven to eight starter level guys: Brevard, Shaw, Burke, Hill, Gilbeau, Taaffe, Muhammed, and maybe McDonald. Winner winner chicken dinner!!! Next year with all but maybe two offensive lineman, 2 of 3 recievers, all but one TE, and the QB returning it'll be the offense shinning and the defense with questions and inconsistency. Quote
Roysterr Posted 1 hour ago Posted 1 hour ago 18 minutes ago, harveycmd said: Better enjoy this defense. We're losing seven to eight starter level guys: Brevard, Shaw, Burke, Hill, Gilbeau, Taaffe, Muhammed, and maybe McDonald. True, but our depth is special. We could have a top 10 defense next year as well. Think Saban's Alabama defenses from year to year Quote
harveycmd Posted 1 hour ago Posted 1 hour ago Just now, Roysterr said: True, but our depth is special. We could have a top 10 defense next year as well. Think Saban's Alabama defenses from year to year That goes to the investment part. Recruited more high level defensive players. Forgot about Trey Moore. He'll be drafted too. Quote
Dread-headed Texan Posted 1 hour ago Posted 1 hour ago 3 minutes ago, Roysterr said: True, but our depth is special. We could have a top 10 defense next year as well. Think Saban's Alabama defenses from year to year They are still going to need time to develop and gel as a unit. Just because you replace a high rated player with another high rated player that doesn't mean you'll get the previous result especially if you're replacing so many. Quote
LiongatheLB Posted 1 hour ago Posted 1 hour ago The offense is nearing the point of a being a letdown in the Sark era. Stoked our defense is what it has become, but I was amped when Sark was hired thinking we'd have the same offensive success Bama had when he ran their offense. My guess is our personnel just isn't there yet. However, I know it's stupid to expect 4 first-round receivers and a first-round RB on the same team. 1 Quote
Dread-headed Texan Posted 52 minutes ago Posted 52 minutes ago 3 minutes ago, LiongatheLB said: The offense is nearing the point of a being a letdown in the Sark era. Stoked our defense is what it has become, but I was amped when Sark was hired thinking we'd have the same offensive success Bama had when he ran their offense. My guess is our personnel just isn't there yet. However, I know it's stupid to expect 4 first-round receivers and a first-round RB on the same team. Do you remember the offense of the 5-7 team? Then the 8-5 team, then both playoff teams. The personnel didn't change in either one of the playoff teams. The offensive line was more finesse than power, they didn't have a power back, and weren't good in the redzone. I wouldn't say they are a let down, just that they were maxed out and wasn't good or had the players needed to push it over the top. They're a disappointment in the sense they couldn't get it done, but IMHO I think Sark got the most of that variation of the offense. 1 Quote
harveycmd Posted 49 minutes ago Posted 49 minutes ago Offensively, Sark is banking on Arch and future QBs playing really well. That's not a bad bet. When we add Arch to Wingo, and hopefully clean up some of the penalties, it should help open the run game more and make things more consistent. Our defense with a consistent offense that provides explosive plays will be very difficult to beat. That combo would have beaten OSU. 1 Quote
LiongatheLB Posted 46 minutes ago Posted 46 minutes ago 2 minutes ago, Dread-headed Texan said: Do you remember the offense of the 5-7 team? Then the 8-5 team, then both playoff teams. The personnel didn't change in either one of the playoff teams. The offensive line was more finesse than power, they didn't have a power back, and weren't good in the redzone. I wouldn't say they are a let down, just that they were maxed out and wasn't good or had the players needed to push it over the top. They're a disappointment in the sense they couldn't get it done, but IMHO I think Sark got the most of that variation of the offense. Of course they've come a long way. My point is that the offense has not been nearly as reliable as the defense. In 2019 Bama put up 41 on that great LSU team and dropped 52 on OSU in the national championship game. I was expecting those kinds of numbers at Texas. 1 Quote
harveycmd Posted 42 minutes ago Posted 42 minutes ago (edited) 5 minutes ago, LiongatheLB said: Of course they've come a long way. My point is that the offense has not been nearly as reliable as the defense. In 2019 Bama put up 41 on that great LSU team and dropped 52 on OSU in the national championship game. I was expecting those kinds of numbers at Texas. Offense in college football doesn't dominate like it did from say 2014-2020. Defenses have caught up by disguising looks and basically playing pass first and run second. You simply don't have championship teams putting up offensive numbers like 2019 LSU or 2020 Bama. Edited 40 minutes ago by harveycmd Quote
Here for the Wins Posted 41 minutes ago Posted 41 minutes ago 57 minutes ago, JKSmith said: I believe that the defense swaps way more personnel in and out compared to the offense. Just takes offense more legit game time to catch up. This is the biggest item. Offense has 6 guys that you don’t really rotate, particularly when going well. As an example, Hill will be gone but Smith and Lefau will be plenty experienced. Similar for Burkes replacement. Sark had an aha moment years ago when Tech ran 100 plays. That plays a part too. It’s also different than offense because he can dictate tempo and player usage. Quote
Dread-headed Texan Posted 40 minutes ago Posted 40 minutes ago 1 minute ago, LiongatheLB said: Of course they've come a long way. My point is that the offense has not been nearly as reliable as the defense. In 2019 Bama put up 41 on that great LSU team and dropped 52 on OSU in the national championship game. I was expecting those kinds of numbers at Texas. A little different eras with NIL and the portal, but I get what you're saying. They also had a first round qb in Tua, that makes a big difference when the qb is the driver of the bus. Quote
LiongatheLB Posted 36 minutes ago Posted 36 minutes ago 1 minute ago, Dread-headed Texan said: A little different eras with NIL and the portal, but I get what you're saying. They also had a first round qb in Tua, that makes a big difference when the qb is the driver of the bus. And, somehow, Mac Jones turned into a first-round pick too lol. I still think Sark has done a great job with the offense, but the inability to put teams away the last two years with the offense needs to improve, along with the offense's failures to score against UGA and OSU the last two years. I will drink a Modelo or six for good luck 1 Quote
Dread-headed Texan Posted 33 minutes ago Posted 33 minutes ago 1 minute ago, LiongatheLB said: And, somehow, Mac Jones turned into a first-round pick too lol. I still think Sark has done a great job with the offense, but the inability to put teams away the last two years with the offense needs to improve, along with the offense's failures to score against UGA and OSU the last two years. I will drink a Modelo or six for good luck I'm usually blitzed by the 3rd quarter, and if it isnt going our way sooner than that🤣🤣🤣 2 Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.