AusMOJO

USC isn't going to let him go. Riley has a good offensive scheme. There is really no reason for him to portal.

No thanks.

I mean circa Texas 2014-2020.

So what you're telling me is....Tom Herman interim HC at FSU?

Yeah Florida State is bad, Clemson is bad, Georgia Tech looks bad, SMU doesn't look near as good as I thought they would. Who else is in the ACC? I forget lol.

I don't think I've seen Sark recruit RB's like that, maybe Baxter but he was way too injury prone. Does Cooper fit that mold?

You don't need to recruit them, just get him in the portal and that's how you play the game these days.

There's quite a few teams on the schedule that have OL's and good RB's. So I'm sure if we're seeing it, Muschamp is seeing it, too. I was just a bit surprised by that, considering the positive reports we heard about the DL.

Yeah, dude is legit but you can't hero ball against quality teams. He'll probably keep them in games they wouldn't otherwise be able to win but I just can't see him putting the team on his shoulders. Their D looked terrible out there and he wasn't getting much help from elsewhere either.

This is where losing Smith is unfortunate because he could be that guy. Cryer is a good dude, he's just too slow.

In fact it felt like the Texas State OL was pushing the DL around, a lot. I know it's only week 1 but I was expecting more from them. Heat is also a factor but still.

Well not only do you expect him to be great, he's being paid a pretty penny for it, too. He wasn't terrible but I just expected to see him dominating better. Hope we see it against Ohio State.

Dude might a piece of sh*t but man that dude could just not be blocked or stopped. Even in the league he was hard to stop.

Well put it this way, if those same miscues show up next week, Ohio State will turn those in to TD's. Muschamp will know this. They'll also probably blitz more and get after Sayin. Not even sure how many sacks we had against Texas State, felt like 1 but it could've been more.

Tbh they'll likely be a .500 team with him.

I could've swore he wanted Golding to come with him but I guess I'm wrong.

Isn't Muschamps negative is he struggles against QB's who can run? We have plenty of those on the schedule, do we anticipate that being an issue?

Didn't Sark want Pete Golding when he first got hired, I can't recall?

You imagine how quiet that place will be if we walk in there and beat them? They'll probably be crying about it all off season, too, lol.

Same with the RB's.

I know there was a ton of hype around ND but man they look pretty average to me. Very surprised tbh.

Boom baby!

Yeah I recall the sack you're talking about, he hesitated on whether to run or not. The defender gave him the ultimatum. He had another pass, I believe the 2nd TD for Coleman, that he threaded really well.

Agree with you about the forced pass for the INT from Arch. Just not a smart play. But apart from that, felt like he did a great job. Run game kind of teetered off through out the game. Defensively, they gave up some plays but it looked worse than it was. There wasn't much to the D, they just kind of got physical and took it to Texas State. Expect Biles to be all over the field next week giving Ohio State O fits.

Despite how bad Clemson is, it's very impressive. No one has utilized the portal better than Lane Kiffin. I think Sark does a great job with it but Kiffin loves to build from the portal.