Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted (edited)

Sorsby is a guy I could see have a meteoric rise and be picked really really high next year...
Kiffin is getting by far the best QB currently in the portal if what Bobby is saying is true.
@LSU next year is gonna be a tough game and enviroment but I do like LSU getting Sorsby rather than Kiffin getting another year with Chambliss.

I will say that he seemed to struggle more the better the opponent which is not usually a good sign but he's also playing for Cincinnati... playcalling and the players around him are gonna be A LOT better next year.

Edited by diegozanna20
Posted
12 minutes ago, diegozanna20 said:

Sorsby is a guy I could see have a meteoric rise and be picked really really high next year...
Kiffin is getting by far the best QB currently in the portal if what Bobby is saying is true.
@LSU next year is gonna be a tough game and enviroment but I do like LSU getting Sorsby rather than Kiffin getting another year with Chambliss.

I will say that he seemed to struggle more the better the opponent which is not usually a good sign but he's also playing for Cincinnati... playcalling and the players around him are gonna be A LOT better next year.

Kinda interesting that Chambliss didn’t follow Kiffin since that’s who gave him the shot from JuCo. He must of fealt jaded by Kiffin too over the move to not wanna follow. 

  • Hook 'Em 1
Posted
2 minutes ago, SB21 said:

Kinda interesting that Chambliss didn’t follow Kiffin since that’s who gave him the shot from JuCo. He must of fealt jaded by Kiffin too over the move to not wanna follow. 

He's out of eligibility unless he wins the lawsuit, he is part of with the Vandy QB.

  • Hook 'Em 1
Posted
6 minutes ago, SB21 said:

Kinda interesting that Chambliss didn’t follow Kiffin since that’s who gave him the shot from JuCo. He must of fealt jaded by Kiffin too over the move to not wanna follow. 

He doesn't have eligibility at this point to follow him anywhere.

  • Hook 'Em 1
Posted
4 minutes ago, SB21 said:

Kinda interesting that Chambliss didn’t follow Kiffin since that’s who gave him the shot from JuCo. He must of fealt jaded by Kiffin too over the move to not wanna follow. 

Chambliss has eligibility issues.. that's why he's going in another direction. He may not get granted another year because of his.juco situation previously. Rather than hope for a last minute decision on paperwork that was filed, if I'm not mistaken, either before this season started, or somewhere within it. The NCAA hasn't even acknowledged it to rule on.

  • Hook 'Em 1
Posted
4 hours ago, TexasFanatic said:

lol happy to let mods here chime in since they can see information 🤣🤣 definitely not him/her. I just have a strong passion about our WRs. Was extremely disappointed in them and don’t see a a championship level group. Hope I’m wrong 

Thankfully you have absolutely no say with Texas roster!

  • Hook 'Em 1
Posted
1 minute ago, 817 Boxing B said:

Chambliss has eligibility issues.. that's why he's going in another direction. He may not get granted another year because of his.juco situation previously. Rather than hope for a last minute decision on paperwork that was filed, if I'm not mistaken, either before this season started, or somewhere within it. The NCAA hasn't even acknowledged it to rule on.

That’s right. My bad. I remember seeing he was trying and just assumed he would get it since Pavia did. Makes sense then 

Posted

Could a standout game from Michael Terry change our mind about Jaden Baugh? Even though NIL is not caped funds are still limited, but that could change with Donor fundraising and aggression. 
 

Question for Board assuming these are on the table after a good Terry/Simon performance, which core offensive group would you want (FYI OL is consistent with each group)

Don’t argue about if these are even possible. They may or may not be. I just want to see sentiment. 

Group 1: 

RB- Baugh

RB- Hawkins

RB- Simon 

RB- Terry 

RB- Cooper 

WR - Wingo 

WR- Mosley 

WR- Singleton

WR- Livingstone

 

Group 2: 

RB- Durham 

RB- Hawkins

RB- Terry

RB- Simon 

RB- Cooper 

WR- Coleman

WR- Wingo 

WR- Mosley 

WR- Livingstone 

Essentially I’m saying Durham plus Coleman is same price as Baugh and Singleton 

 

Posted
2 hours ago, Bunk Moreland said:

That might be the best player in the portal. Second team all America over Colin Simmons. Certainly moves the needle.

Michigan bound

Posted
7 minutes ago, TexasFanatic said:

Could a standout game from Michael Terry change our mind about Jaden Baugh?

 

Absolutely not, given the injury bug we've had over the past few seasons at the position.  We need to get quality options and rebuild our depth.  

Posted
4 minutes ago, genevalonghorn said:

Absolutely not, given the injury bug we've had over the past few seasons at the position.  We need to get quality options and rebuild our depth.  

My scenario with that included us getting Hawkins and Durham. Portal backs are likely happening 

Posted
52 minutes ago, diegozanna20 said:

Sorsby is a guy I could see have a meteoric rise and be picked really really high next year...
Kiffin is getting by far the best QB currently in the portal if what Bobby is saying is true.
@LSU next year is gonna be a tough game and enviroment but I do like LSU getting Sorsby rather than Kiffin getting another year with Chambliss.

I will say that he seemed to struggle more the better the opponent which is not usually a good sign but he's also playing for Cincinnati... playcalling and the players around him are gonna be A LOT better next year.

Super surprised if this is true because everything and I do mean everything was pointing to Tech on this one. The thing that shall remain nameless looks like it may not longer be undefeated if this comes to pass.

Posted
5 minutes ago, GQ03 said:

Super surprised if this is true because everything and I do mean everything was pointing to Tech on this one. The thing that shall remain nameless looks like it may not longer be undefeated if this comes to pass.

Kiffin fits the bill. Still undefeated. 

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.