Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
15 minutes ago, MJW2327 said:

You're missing the point. More subscribers = more money? what a concept

I think you’re missing the point. Yall are complaining about new subscribers as if the fact you have been here longer makes you better or something. No one should be against new people, even if some of them have bad takes. 

  • Hook 'Em 1
Posted
1 hour ago, drag worm said:

The tea leaves sure seem like the portal options have closed, so try it without the *Portal starter and that’s where I start to wonder how this interior OL holds up in the SEC trenches. We have sorely been needing angry people movers at guard. 

Without a *Portal starter, Chatman, Sikorski, Coleman, and Cojoe (eventually) will likely be competing for the open Guard spot. We should be able to get a competent player from those candidates.

Additionally, we’re still looking at Portal options so there will likely be more options to consider when it’s all said and done. Turn your frown upside down and enjoy this period of Longhorn success 🤘🏼

  • Hook 'Em 1
Posted
21 minutes ago, Guts said:

I think you’re missing the point. Yall are complaining about new subscribers as if the fact you have been here longer makes you better or something. No one should be against new people, even if some of them have bad takes. 

Can you point me to the post I made about complaining about new subscribers? I'll wait. I was explaining Rock P's point and you continue to prove mine

Posted
23 minutes ago, Guts said:

I think you’re missing the point. Yall are complaining about new subscribers as if the fact you have been here longer makes you better or something. No one should be against new people, even if some of them have bad takes. 

not saying that at all..ijust noticed a correlation..Do with that info what you want.

  • Hook 'Em 1
Posted
1 minute ago, MJW2327 said:

Can you point me to the post I made about complaining about new subscribers? I'll wait. I was explaining Rock P's point and you continue to prove mine

My post was in regard to the number of times people have complained about new posters in here and the 1 dollar crew sucking, not you specifically. You responded to me so I responded in turn.


Your overall condescending tone when responding to me continues to prove my point. 

Posted
5 minutes ago, Rocky P said:

not saying that at all..ijust noticed a correlation..Do with that info what you want.

I’m not really disagreeing, but you have posted about it quite a few times so I figured I’d throw in my 2 cents. 

Posted
Just now, Guts said:

My post was in regard to the number of times people have complained about new posters in here and the 1 dollar crew sucking, not you specifically. You responded to me so I responded in turn.


Your overall condescending tone when responding to me continues to prove my point. 

I don’t think it’s fair to paint the whole $1 crew with a wide brush. The frustration that I think some have (and that I had initially) is that OTF started out as a fairly small, tight-knit community with a culture that was generally more easy-going and amiable. For many of us, that’s a big reason we left other sites like IT and OB—to escape the toxic board culture. Almost immediately after the $1 special started, there was an influx of users from those other sites who seemed to embody their toxic cultures. It’s clearly not fair to attribute that to everyone. And you’re completely right that growth is good because, ultimately, this is a business. Many of us are just protective of what we have here. But no reason for us to also not be welcoming and embrace a growing board. So, welcome!

  • Hook 'Em 3
Posted
12 minutes ago, Bunk Moreland said:

I don’t think it’s fair to paint the whole $1 crew with a wide brush. The frustration that I think some have (and that I had initially) is that OTF started out as a fairly small, tight-knit community with a culture that was generally more easy-going and amiable. For many of us, that’s a big reason we left other sites like IT and OB—to escape the toxic board culture. Almost immediately after the $1 special started, there was an influx of users from those other sites who seemed to embody their toxic cultures. It’s clearly not fair to attribute that to everyone. And you’re completely right that growth is good because, ultimately, this is a business. Many of us are just protective of what we have here. But no reason for us to also not be welcoming and embrace a growing board. So, welcome!

Yea I definitely get that. I’m new to all of these boards, I found OTF on Spotify and liked their content and then joined for a year right when the special started lol. From what little I’ve picked up, this seems to be the best of the boards. I love the guys and their content so I’m here to stay. I think when you get a influx of members there will be some bad apples, and I was annoyed as well with how much people were complaining, I just didn’t like the ‘1 dollar crew sucks’ narrative. But thank you! 

  • Hook 'Em 3
Posted
7 minutes ago, 4thandFive said:

OTF used to be just Joe and Gerry waving their empty wrapping paper tubes at each other like swords. Them was good times.
 

Best of times 

  • Haha 2
Posted

I just don't understand why we didn't go after that guard Alou or whatever his name was. Even if the staff didn't think he was better, he still would've provided depth and competition. The staff overplayed their hand and got called on it. But whatever, we are here now and there is nothing we can do about it. I still trust Sark because of how far he's brought this program. But I don't blindly trust him like I used to.

Posted
2 minutes ago, Deep in the heart said:

I just don't understand why we didn't go after that guard Alou or whatever his name was. Even if the staff didn't think he was better, he still would've provided depth and competition. The staff overplayed their hand and got called on it. But whatever, we are here now and there is nothing we can do about it. I still trust Sark because of how far he's brought this program. But I don't blindly trust him like I used to.

It seemed like they preferred Jordan Church and were trying to bring him in for a visit, but were too late. I had no problem with the swing for the fences strategy, but by the time the portal was almost closed, it should’ve been time to cut their losses and go all-in on a second-tier guard like Church. I think they overplayed their hand. Too focused on landing a big fish and not agile enough in pivoting.

  • Hook 'Em 2
Posted

Prior to Cojoe getting injured I remember a lot of smoke about him pushing Baker out at right tackle last fall. When he gets healthy he will be a factor imo

  • Hook 'Em 3
Posted
52 minutes ago, Guts said:

My post was in regard to the number of times people have complained about new posters in here and the 1 dollar crew sucking, not you specifically. You responded to me so I responded in turn.


Your overall condescending tone when responding to me continues to prove my point. 

Didn't mean to come off that way although it was the end result; either way, I'm happy the community is growing 

  • Hook 'Em 2
Posted
30 minutes ago, Gerry Hamilton said:

Depth guy competing for a 2nd team spot. 

so you are telling me that our starting Oline is going to be all backups?? GOT IT

  • Haha 1
  • Sad 1
Posted (edited)

I guess in the era of the portal nobody believes development of younger guys is a thing anymore. Hard to imagine how anybody coming up gets a chance with this mindset. You don’t know what the next man up can do if he’s never given the chance to be the next man up

Edited by Beard N Balls Bundle

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.