Jump to content

House Settlement

GoHorns1

By GoHorns1
in On Texas Football Forum

 Share

Recommended Posts

GoHorns1 Lifetime Longhorn

GoHorns1

Posted
Posted

The judge will NOT approve the House Settlement as currently written. She has issues with roster size. Sorry can’t copy X link since I refuse to give any money to Musk.

  • Hook 'Em 2
  • Thanks 5
  • Haha 1
  • Confused 1
  • Sad 1
birdlaw5895 Freshman

birdlaw5895

Posted
Posted

Can somebody break down the house settlement like they’re talking to a third grader 😂

we’ve done pretty well in the Wild West, would the settlement slow our role or would we adapt and overcome regardless? 

  • Thanks 1
  • Sad 1
Jeff05 Freshman

Jeff05

Posted
Posted (edited)

“U.S. District Judge Claudia Wilken signaled she is ready to approve the rest of the settlement but wants both sides to come up with a way to not harm current athletes who will lose their spots on teams. The settlement calls for scholarship limits to be replaced by roster limits.”

 

https://www.espn.com/college-sports/story/_/id/44823761/judge-delays-house-settlement-approval-roster-limits

Edited by Jeff05
  • Thanks 1
  • Sad 1
Hashtag Lifetime Longhorn

Hashtag

Posted
Posted
13 minutes ago, horns96 said:

So it's delayed to protect .... walk-ons?  🤦‍♂️

I don’t see Texas going past 85 even with settlement. Fewer players to spend the allotment on gives you more money per player. 

  • Sad 1
Jbro52 All-Conference

Jbro52

Posted
Posted
14 minutes ago, horns96 said:

So it's delayed to protect .... walk-ons?  🤦‍♂️

Most coaches are wanting to keep/protect walk ons

  • Hook 'Em 1
  • Sad 1
Realist Horn All-American

Realist Horn

Posted
Posted
45 minutes ago, birdlaw5895 said:

Can somebody break down the house settlement like they’re talking to a third grader 😂

we’ve done pretty well in the Wild West, would the settlement slow our role or would we adapt and overcome regardless? 

Chat GPT is your go to

  • Sad 1
GoHorns1 Lifetime Longhorn

GoHorns1

Posted
  • Author
Posted

Here’s my non legal idea. First limit the number of years of eligibility to 5 with NO exceptions for all sports. Second allow all the walkons to remain on the rosters for remaining years of their 5 year eligibility rule. Make the suggested roster limits effective in five years when all the walkons eligibility has expired.

 

  • Sad 1
southpaw Sophomore

southpaw

Posted
Posted
9 minutes ago, Bobby Burton said:

 

This is accurate. They are cutting to 105. 

And that appears to be why the judge has a problem with it... for the current members of football and other sports who would get shut out by the lower limits 

  • Sad 1
BevoFlyer Freshman

BevoFlyer

Posted
Posted
44 minutes ago, horns96 said:

So it's delayed to protect .... walk-ons?  🤦‍♂️

Delayed to protect athletes already on scholarship, particularly athletes in non-revenue sports.

  • Sad 1

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
 Share
Go to topic listing
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.