Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
34 minutes ago, HookemDTX said:

And they just brought home the Conference Championship by beating UCLA again.

Should get a favorable seed in the national tournament 

  • Hook 'Em 3
Posted
On 4/24/2026 at 8:04 AM, tmataya said:

Does beach volleyball count? If so it looks like they are on a collision course with Stanford. 

It does, the NCAA tournament. Not the MPSF conference tournament they just won though. 
 

They should get a really good seed for the ncaa tournament, top 3, and have a great chance for a top 4 or better finish.  

Posted
7 minutes ago, DirectorsCupUpdates said:

It does, the NCAA tournament. Not the MPSF conference tournament they just won though. 
 

They should get a really good seed for the ncaa tournament, top 3, and have a great chance for a top 4 or better finish.  

Guessing seeds announced tomorrow,Sunday April 26?

Posted
On 4/25/2026 at 9:31 PM, GoHorns1 said:

Guessing seeds announced tomorrow,Sunday April 26?

Texas got the 2 seed, would meet 3 seed ucla in the semis. I think this is best for Texas as they are 3-2 on the year and have won the last 3 against ucla. 
 

Stanford gets the 1 seed, Texas is 0-3 vs Stanford this year. 

  • Thanks 1
Posted
On 4/27/2026 at 1:04 PM, GoHorns1 said:

Texas 1st round match vs Georgia State is on ESPN2 or ESPN+ Friday May 1 at 1pm

I am in New Orleans, not far from Gulf Shores. Not in the cards this year but maybe I'll plan to take a beach trip with my family during this week in future years!

Posted

https://x.com/Direct_Cupdates/status/2049456363336589434

UCLA, Florida have chances to add significant points in Tennis this weekend if they can advance. Stanford could too but the gain would be limited as they have sports already expected to score around 60 points. 

Texas needs to see both Tennis teams advance, either not advancing would lead to a significant score drop.

1 seed Stanford, 2 seed Texas, 3 seed UCLA in beach volleyball this weekend as well. Any change better or worse this weekend would adjust predicted score as well.

  • Hook 'Em 4
Posted

I have Stanford with a much higher projection (1314.5), so I'm wondering what's amiss.   I have fall/winter subtotal at 917.5 as at thedirectorscup.com, then spring projections of 83 (W WP - final), 100 (BVB), 60 (one of W LAX or M Golf), 100 ( W Golf), 90 (Row), 64 (Softball), and then excluded scores for M/W tennis (50,50),one of W LAX or M Golf (60), and W T&F (50).  Those scores further cause the fall/scores for M WP (55) and M Fencing (45) to be excluded, so that's 917.5-100+497=1314.5, so we're about 60 points apart. which is suspicious.  

btw, #1 UCLA got upset in the qf of men's VB, so they dropped 40 projected points there. I think.   

Posted
3 hours ago, nozatx said:

I have Stanford with a much higher projection (1314.5), so I'm wondering what's amiss.   I have fall/winter subtotal at 917.5 as at thedirectorscup.com, then spring projections of 83 (W WP - final), 100 (BVB), 60 (one of W LAX or M Golf), 100 ( W Golf), 90 (Row), 64 (Softball), and then excluded scores for M/W tennis (50,50),one of W LAX or M Golf (60), and W T&F (50).  Those scores further cause the fall/scores for M WP (55) and M Fencing (45) to be excluded, so that's 917.5-100+497=1314.5, so we're about 60 points apart. which is suspicious.  

btw, #1 UCLA got upset in the qf of men's VB, so they dropped 40 projected points there. I think.   

UCLA defeated Stanford  in BVB means less points

Posted
2 hours ago, GoHorns1 said:

UCLA defeated Stanford  in BVB means less points

Yep, they drop 10 from the #1 seeding position there, but UT also dropped 7 from the #2 seeding by missing the finals, so close to a wash in terms of projections.   
Big difference between UT's and Stanford's overall position is that UT doesn't have extra scoring sports to cover a big unexpected letdown.  Stanford has solid scores which are currently outside the 20 sport cutoff (5 50+ scores) which would just slide into place in case of an unexpectedly poor performance in some sport.  UT doesn't have that buffer, so all the spring sports really have to perform in order to grab the DC.

Posted (edited)
36 minutes ago, nozatx said:

Yep, they drop 10 from the #1 seeding position there, but UT also dropped 7 from the #2 seeding by missing the finals, so close to a wash in terms of projections.   
Big difference between UT's and Stanford's overall position is that UT doesn't have extra scoring sports to cover a big unexpected letdown.  Stanford has solid scores which are currently outside the 20 sport cutoff (5 50+ scores) which would just slide into place in case of an unexpectedly poor performance in some sport.  UT doesn't have that buffer, so all the spring sports really have to perform in order to grab the DC.

Stanford didn’t score any points on required sports men’s and women’s basketball. Unfortunately Texas didn’t score points women’s soccer a required sport.

Edited by GoHorns1
Posted

This epitomizes why the director’s cup is flawed. Stanford hasn’t sniffed a decent finish in any major sport yet they’re still hanging around because of obscure sports that count way too much. Just one guy’s opinion. 

  • Hook 'Em 4
Posted

The Cup isn’t about who’s good in the big‑ticket sports - it’s about total program depth. Stanford scores well because they’re elite in a ton of sports most schools don’t even sponsor. So, i would say>> That’s the system doing exactly what it was built to reward.

Posted
2 hours ago, HonkEm said:

The Cup isn’t about who’s good in the big‑ticket sports - it’s about total program depth. Stanford scores well because they’re elite in a ton of sports most schools don’t even sponsor. So, i would say>> That’s the system doing exactly what it was built to reward.

Agree to disagree. Are they truly elite at these sports or are they simply succeeding because of limited competition or interest? That to me is not success, it’s gaming a system to get undue notoriety for having breadth of options not depth of excellence in the sports that are paid the most attention. 

  • Hook 'Em 2
Posted
7 hours ago, GoHorns1 said:

Stanford didn’t score any points on required sports men’s and women’s basketball. Unfortunately Texas didn’t score points women’s soccer a required sport.

This needs to improve big time! Hopefully,  our new coach, the potential of a new facility (where the bubble is now), can improve this team so we can be a powerhouse!

Posted (edited)
15 hours ago, Califashorn75 said:

What sports does Stanford have that we don't as it relates to the Director's Cup. 

At least water polo (M/W), fencing (M/W), wrestling (M), gymnastics (M/W), lacrosse (W).  volleyball (M), and soccer (M).   Water polo is certainly a niche sports, as is men's volleyball (only 23 Div 1 programs)..  Men's wrestling has a surprisingly large number of schools which compete.  There are only 12 division 1 men's gymnastics programs.  There are 70 men's D1 lacrosse programs but only 30 women's D1.

Out of these sports, Stanford is projected to use the scores from M SOC (64), W Fencing (60 - might be excluded), M wrestling (73.5), gymnastics (100 & 71.25), and maybe W lacrosse (60).   

I've read that Ohio State has an even larger number of Div 1 sports, but they're not that competitive in DC.   

Edited by nozatx
  • Hook 'Em 1
Posted

Next up for me in priority would be an indoor track facility.  Always seemed weird that there wasn't one and seems like it would help for training and recruiting.  T&F is 4 of the included sports. 

Btw, Stanford upset A&M in 2nd round of men's tennis so that is now an unexpected scoring sport for them.  They get #6 TCU in next round.   Let's go Frogs.

 

  • Hook 'Em 2

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.