AusMOJO Posted 5 hours ago Posted 5 hours ago 1 hour ago, pinkman_90 said: Can’t watch this and not get distracted by how slow Stroh is. He didn't look like he was running, as much as he was shuffling out there. Then Baker, well I don't know what he was doing. Quote
Burt Reynolds Jr Posted 2 hours ago Author Posted 2 hours ago 6 hours ago, NothinButDaHorns34 said: Fair weathered “what have you done for me lately” types of fans on here Four years of mediocre OL play isn’t “lately” 1 Quote
Burt Reynolds Jr Posted 2 hours ago Author Posted 2 hours ago The fact that they think Stroh is better than Neto scares me Quote
Bonaparte Posted 2 hours ago Posted 2 hours ago 5 hours ago, General Grant said: Write CDC a letter. A strongly worded one of course. Quote
pskjace Posted 2 hours ago Posted 2 hours ago The OL was always going to regress pretty significantly when you lose your starting center, left guard, right tackle, and left tackle all to the NFL. Not to mention your LT was a top 10 pick and the Center being the most difficult to replace. Outside of having all new starters the biggest issue I see even with improvement is the lack of athleticism at left guard. That is a Charlie Strong level offensive guard. 1 Quote
General Grant Posted 2 hours ago Posted 2 hours ago 33 minutes ago, Bonaparte said: A strongly worded one of course. Do it civil war style and sign it, Your obedient servant, xxx Quote
Atticus Posted 2 hours ago Posted 2 hours ago You guys really forget how bad the OL was during the Strong/Herman days. This is a solid step back from the last three years, but it is still better than that overall slop. 1 Quote
Forrest J. Posted 1 hour ago Posted 1 hour ago (edited) 14 hours ago, MBHORNSFAN said: I don’t see that ever happening. Flood and Sark are tied at the hip and boys. I suspect a lot of Texas fans will be calling for Sark to be fired soon. I’m not calling for him to be fired at all, but I am of the belief that we may have seen the best of Sark as a coach and program builder. It’s not a given that he’s going to win titles here. When we look back on the Sark era, we may realize that his best contribution to the program was to get it back to a championship “caliber” program. The vast majority of coaches who won titles did so within the first five years of being the coach of the team/program. History shows that if Sark doesn’t do it this season, he probably never will with Texas. Edited 1 hour ago by Forrest J. 1 Quote
MBHORNSFAN Posted 1 hour ago Posted 1 hour ago 2 minutes ago, Forrest J. said: I’m not calling for him to be fired at all, but I am of the belief that we may have seen the best of Sark as a coach and program builder. It’s not a given that he’s going to win titles here. When we look back on the Sark era, we may realize that his best contribution to the program was to get it back to a championship “caliber” program. I respect your take and it is fair but we do not know this yet. It took Mack longer than 5 years to get there too. The best part we are gonna get to find outl. 1 Quote
Forrest J. Posted 1 hour ago Posted 1 hour ago 2 minutes ago, MBHORNSFAN said: I respect your take and it is fair but we do not know this yet. It took Mack longer than 5 years to get there too. The best part we are gonna get to find outl. Mack is an anomaly. 2 Quote
Andrew Scott Posted 47 minutes ago Posted 47 minutes ago And last years OL class doesn’t inspire confidence it will get better. Hoping for major over correction in the portal. 1 Quote
HookedOnTF Posted 31 minutes ago Posted 31 minutes ago 50 minutes ago, Forrest J. said: I’m not calling for him to be fired at all, but I am of the belief that we may have seen the best of Sark as a coach and program builder. It’s not a given that he’s going to win titles here. When we look back on the Sark era, we may realize that his best contribution to the program was to get it back to a championship “caliber” program. The vast majority of coaches who won titles did so within the first five years of being the coach of the team/program. History shows that if Sark doesn’t do it this season, he probably never will with Texas. Counterpoint, if we beat OSU last year and face ND, and beat UW the year before and face Michigan, maybe he has two. But to your point, we did neither, thanks to the offensive side of the ball. It's not just luck, evolution and growth are needed. Counterpoint, who out there is better suited to keep us in contention? An old Saban, a detestable Urban? I wouldn't even want Day or Dabo. Lanning is unproven. How's DeBoer doing? Let's try Shanahan! Our best bet is for Sark to get over the hump, which to the OP point, may involve tough evals of his inner circle. Quote
HookedOnTF Posted 23 minutes ago Posted 23 minutes ago 15 hours ago, Casey67 said: 4 starters from last year made NFL rosters. If that doesn't buy a coach a little more grace than this, I don't know what does. If Cristobal didn't go to Miami, are Banks and Cam even at Texas? But, he landed the Brocks, so there's always that! Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.