PaulieD Posted 2 hours ago Posted 2 hours ago 8 hours ago, Jeff Howe said: I want to see what kind of difference a healthy Wisner makes for the running game. The running game was solid. I can see some things improving, but I'm still concerned about the short-yardage offense against some of the better defensive fronts Texas will face. I think Wisner will be a great addition when healthy, he adds a hard running style that we need. It was good to see other RB get much needed work heading into SEC schedule. 1 Quote
ClubWhatever Posted 2 hours ago Posted 2 hours ago 8 hours ago, AusMOJO said: Guys on the commentary team mentioned how Sark wanted to see Lacey in this game, could be that he wants to red shirt him. He already redshirted 1 1 Quote
AusMOJO Posted 2 hours ago Posted 2 hours ago 4 minutes ago, ClubWhatever said: He already redshirted You mean the guy who just got here as a Fr? 2 Quote
AusMOJO Posted 2 hours ago Posted 2 hours ago 16 minutes ago, AusMOJO said: Do you think Robertson to C permanently and Hutson back to LG would help? Robertson seems to play the C spot way more naturally than Hutson does. Nvm, you already answered this one. 1 Quote
Kevin C Posted 1 hour ago Posted 1 hour ago Good stuff Jeff. Awesome way to finish non-conf play, going into the bye with lots of positive momentum. Excited for Arch and the receivers who looked much more in rhythm. Quote
CoachBobbyFinstock Posted 57 minutes ago Posted 57 minutes ago (edited) Still stunning to me we didn’t portal an Olineman or two. Honestly everything put a good taste in my mouth but that position and maybe Niblett in the return game. They are going to be greatly tested in the next two weeks by Fla and OU. Good thing Arch can run. Edited 57 minutes ago by CoachBobbyFinstock Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.