Cam Coleman

[Zachery Nelson]

If you’re texas and Cam Coleman goes in the portal do you go get a wideout that is a true number 1 stud ? I lean yes just cause wingo hasn’t played well all year and I have a gut feeling we are gonna lose some of our depth at wideout to the portal 

[LonghornFan4Ever]

Only way it happens is if Moore goes pro after this season and Butler + one more WR hit the portal.  Even then, might be tough to get him from an NIL standpoint.

[Gerry Hamilton]

Think it's deeper than that.

His likely asking price would  mean telling the depth goodbye, Wingo and maybe Mosley or Moore (unless Moore goes pro)

That's probably what he will ask for in terms on positional NIL 

[NothinButDaHorns34]

I just hope sark gets dogs like he did for quinn. We could be looking at arch’s last year so give him ALL the resources to be great. 

[Thanos72]

Only comes if the chance to win outweighs the bag. He’d have to take a legitimate haircut. One, I’d never ask or try to influence someone to take. Real money would be loss. 

[Thanos72]

Just now, NothinButDaHorns34 said:

I just hope sark gets dogs like he did for quinn. We could be looking at arch’s last year so give him ALL the resources to be great. 

What intrigues me is we might them. Game 49 of the year against vandy before we hue strong the receivers can be. Started with 200 potential yards for Wingo against msst. I think that room is good enough to win if all. Oline, dline, and one elite cb for me. 

[Bobby Burton]

I don’t see how Coleman happens unless the WR room is completely re-worked. Not sure Texas wants to do that.

[Quinncent McManning, Jr.]

I can see aggy going all in for a guy once committed to them 

[jkates]

Nope. 

[CJ Vogel]

2 minutes ago, Quinncent McManning, Jr. said:

I can see aggy going all in for a guy once committed to them 

Yep, definitely.

[JMarquette]

12 minutes ago, CJ Vogel said:

Yep, definitely.

That’s a $3,000,000 ask right there. A&M would kill any depth if they got that done.

[GoHorns1]

Not happening, time to move on!

[TexasEx_10]

Texas mentioned in article.

[Joe Naural]

Not sure there is a better Wr core than Tennessse.  Tall … fast and catch!  Impressive
 

 Terry, French and Lockett ???? Is the talent there?  

[Aspann85]

1 hour ago, TexasEx_10 said:

Texas mentioned in article.

If his agent is Mulugheta as the article says, no way we get him. Yes, he’s represented a bunch of Horns, but David has been getting record setting deals done in the NFL regularly from every position. I don’t see that working in our favor unless he convinces him that Texas could boost his stock best for the NFL BIG money. I’ve been around him enough to know that probably ain’t happening.

[drag worm]

I see the need in the WR room being higher for a burner that can take the top off the D. Cam is really really good but more resembles what we hope we can get out of Wingo and what we're already getting out of Parker, a tall lanky contested catch guy with a wide catch radius. With Wingo, Livingstone and Mosely all back I think you're basically judging whether Ffrench or Lockett can be the missing piece (if they can't then attrition from them is not a problem) and then you move to the portal to see who you can flush in there that helps provide NFL burner level speed to go along with everyone we have back.  In this NIL / portal era you have to rip the bandaid pretty quickly on bad-evaluations and five star receivers who don't come in wowing people probably fall into that category.

Edited 2 hours ago by drag worm

[SpaceCityWrangler]

Wingo, Livingstone and Mosley… then you have all the young bucks.  Texas won’t be that battle.

[Zachery Nelson]

2 hours ago, Gerry Hamilton said:

Think it's deeper than that.

His likely asking price would  mean telling the depth goodbye, Wingo and maybe Mosley or Moore (unless Moore goes pro)

That's probably what he will ask for in terms on positional NIL 

Kinda figured the asking price would be to high , the whole nil sharing is crap with schools like texas are making more then any of the others but can’t honestly spend more is dumb