Jump to content

Recommended Posts

  • Moderators
Posted
1 minute ago, Rocky P said:

I agree.  The biggest problem i have with these G5 players is how much of their production is due to competition versus ability.  Feel like there is more risk/reward than targeting p4 players that have tape against better competition.  @CJ Vogel how do you judge that or weigh it during this process?

That's where the scouting department earns their big bucks.

It's easy to go P4 to P4, but there are always gems from the lower level. I always prefer the bigger school prospects.

  • Hook 'Em 3
  • Moderators
Posted
2 minutes ago, Beast Texas said:

Thoughts on this Breaux?

Screenshot_20251208_143439_X.jpg

As long as Justus Terry is in burnt orange, this one makes little sense.

Breaux weighs about 275-280 pounds. Can't have too many of those guys on your DL and Terry already has sky high expectations.

  • Hook 'Em 5
  • Moderators
Posted

Michigan State OL Gavin Broscious run blocking in 2025.

For those wondering, that will be a big point of emphasis in the portal searching.

Screenshot 2025-12-08 at 2.40.55 PM.png

  • Hook 'Em 4
Posted
1 minute ago, CJ Vogel said:

 

He looks like a possible take, but ideally as the 3rd guard. Not sure you’d want to rely on a guy like that who has experience and a lot of promise but isn’t a completely proven commodity.

  • Hook 'Em 2
Posted
15 minutes ago, CJ Vogel said:

Michigan State OL Gavin Broscious run blocking in 2025.

For those wondering, that will be a big point of emphasis in the portal searching.

Screenshot 2025-12-08 at 2.40.55 PM.png

So, better than our IOL.

  • Hook 'Em 2
  • Moderators
Posted

For what it's worth, I have been keeping a running list of prospects who have announced portal intentions that I believe to needle moving targets for Texas.

I've yet to add any offensive linemen to that list.

Obviously this isn't an exact science, nor is it indicative of what Texas will do. But as of now, I don't see any big time needle moving players so far that would be immediate plug and play options for Texas on the interior.

If and when those players enter, I will make sure mention who I believe to be immediate options.

  • Hook 'Em 6
  • Thanks 1
Posted
3 minutes ago, CJ Vogel said:

For what it's worth, I have been keeping a running list of prospects who have announced portal intentions that I believe to needle moving targets for Texas.

I've yet to add any offensive linemen to that list.

Obviously this isn't an exact science, nor is it indicative of what Texas will do. But as of now, I don't see any big time needle moving players so far that would be immediate plug and play options for Texas on the interior.

If and when those players enter, I will make sure mention who I believe to be immediate options.

Dang it CJ get out there and find us some guards!

  • Haha 1
  • Moderators
Posted

You have my attention.

Harkless recorded 3 sacks this season at 6-3, 345. 

10 pressures from up the middle would have been tied for 2nd on this year's Texas DL.

  • Hook 'Em 12
Posted
2 minutes ago, CJ Vogel said:

You have my attention.

Harkless recorded 3 sacks this season at 6-3, 345. 

10 pressures from up the middle would have been tied for 2nd on this year's Texas DL.

Get that Purdue to Texas pipeline going🤘😭

  • Haha 3
Posted
3 minutes ago, CJ Vogel said:

You have my attention.

Harkless recorded 3 sacks this season at 6-3, 345. 

10 pressures from up the middle would have been tied for 2nd on this year's Texas DL.

We need a big body to clog up running lanes while also providing some disruption. We have that Purdue —> Texas DT pipeline going, so seems like a good fit.

Posted (edited)
8 minutes ago, CJ Vogel said:

You have my attention.

Harkless recorded 3 sacks this season at 6-3, 345. 

10 pressures from up the middle would have been tied for 2nd on this year's Texas DL.

Yes please

Wonder If Kenny Baker has any relationship from his time at Western Kentucky

Edited by John F.
  • Hook 'Em 1
Posted
5 minutes ago, CJ Vogel said:

You have my attention.

Harkless recorded 3 sacks this season at 6-3, 345. 

10 pressures from up the middle would have been tied for 2nd on this year's Texas DL.

He’s also only a sophomore. Could have him a couple more years.

  • Hook 'Em 1
Posted

This portal cycle is already screaming one thing: availability ≠ fit.

There’s a lot of movement, a lot of names, and a lot of folks getting excited because a recruiting profile exists. But Texas shouldn’t be shopping for interesting—we should be shopping for transformative.

As Bobby and Gerry like to say: is the juice worth the squeeze?
If the answer isn’t “this fixes a real problem immediately,” keep scrolling.

  • A rotational DT who looks like three guys we already have? No squeeze.
  • A WR who replicates what’s already in the room? Minimal juice.
  • An OL who can’t move people off the ball? We’ve seen that movie.

The only portal additions that matter right now are:

  • trench players who change the physical tone
  • a RB who actually scares defenses
  • veterans who reduce downside, not add learning curves

This is Arch’s window. Not a rebuild. Not a science experiment.
Take fewer swings. Make them violent.

  • Hook 'Em 1
Posted
2 hours ago, Connor Vaughn said:

That’s nothing more than a bored internet talking nonsense atp

He's not leaving ND with the recruits they just brought in. That #2 class was a who's who of former NFL players sons'. He was too close to the natty to dip.

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.