Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

The Big XII, under the leadership of the great Yormark, should reply "Bring It."

By so doing, they would force the Tech administration to even more prominently establish their position standing alone against the traditional ethics and practices of college sports.

Disgraceful.

  • Hook 'Em 1
Posted

I did not realize that Paxton is doing his job.  The Attorney General is representing Texas Tech, which is a state university .  Paxton would do the same thing for the University of Texas if the same thing were happening to the UT quarterback.

  • Haha 4
  • Sad 1
Posted (edited)
1 hour ago, Bobbers said:

I did not realize that Paxton is doing his job.  The Attorney General is representing Texas Tech, which is a state university .  Paxton would do the same thing for the University of Texas if the same thing were happening to the UT quarterback.

How exactly would a conference using its bylaws to sanction Tech run afoul of any state law?  It's just a naked shakedown and another abuse of power - which our esteemed AG has a long and documented history.

Edited by horns96
  • Thanks 1
Posted
2 hours ago, horns96 said:

How exactly would a conference using its bylaws to sanction Tech run afoul of any state law?  It's just a naked shakedown and another abuse of power - which our esteemed AG has a long and documented history.

Texas Tech is a state school.  The Attorney General is protecting a state entity.  I can tell a lot of you don't like Paxton, and none of you like Texas Tech, but the truth still matters.

A judge made his ruling in favor of a state entity.  The AG is protecting the interests of the state entity.   I personally think the Judge's ruling is insane, but that is not the point here.

The NCAA has appealed.  I think they will win in court making Paxton's letter a moot point.

No matter what happens, Texas Tech has turned this into a PR nigthmare and they have tarnished their reputation for a generation.

  • Hook 'Em 1
Posted
1 hour ago, Bobbers said:

Texas Tech is a state school.  The Attorney General is protecting a state entity.  I can tell a lot of you don't like Paxton, and none of you like Texas Tech, but the truth still matters.

A judge made his ruling in favor of a state entity.  The AG is protecting the interests of the state entity.   I personally think the Judge's ruling is insane, but that is not the point here.

The NCAA has appealed.  I think they will win in court making Paxton's letter a moot point.

No matter what happens, Texas Tech has turned this into a PR nigthmare and they have tarnished their reputation for a generation.

So Paxton is writing legal threats against something that the Big XII might do…. Meanwhile I haven’t heard a thing from the AG’s office about the documented violation of Texas state gambling laws that Sorsby has admitted to.  His priorities are “interesting” at best.  

  • Hook 'Em 1
Posted
6 hours ago, Bobbers said:

I did not realize that Paxton is doing his job.  The Attorney General is representing Texas Tech, which is a state university .  Paxton would do the same thing for the University of Texas if the same thing were happening to the UT quarterback.

University of Texas would have to willingly contradict a long standing NCAA standard of student athletes conduct.  No other University has taken that stance other than TTU.

Capiche??? 

Posted
2 minutes ago, Burnt Orange Horn said:

University of Texas would have to willingly contradict a long standing NCAA standard of student athletes conduct.  No other University has taken that stance other than TTU.

Capiche??? 

No, you don't understand.  Paxton is literally doing his job by representing a state university.  Burnt orange glasses are good for Saturdays in the Fall, but for other days I prefer the truth.

Posted
3 hours ago, Bobbers said:

Texas Tech is a state school.  The Attorney General is protecting a state entity.  I can tell a lot of you don't like Paxton, and none of you like Texas Tech, but the truth still matters.

A judge made his ruling in favor of a state entity.  The AG is protecting the interests of the state entity.   I personally think the Judge's ruling is insane, but that is not the point here.

The NCAA has appealed.  I think they will win in court making Paxton's letter a moot point.

No matter what happens, Texas Tech has turned this into a PR nigthmare and they have tarnished their reputation for a generation.

I agree this a nightmare, I agree with your thoughts on Protecting a state university. State of Texas cant donanything criminal, because Sorsby didn't make bets or was underage at the time in Texas. So, it would be a the request of the States and Federal because of cross state, I think, I am no lawyer. But, at the same time cant the Big 12 suspend him if he was under investigation by law enforcement, that would stop all this. 

End of the day, Campbell should have backed away and cut his losses. But, by doubling down is creating a lose lose for everybody. Whatever, dreams Tech had at being included in the Big boy world of college sports went out the door.

How does one suspend a current athlete at Tech from betting on a sport the play. So, you are undercut the Athletic Director and Coach, so why should the players l8sten and how do you discipline. 

So messed up. 

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.