HonkEm Posted 3 hours ago Posted 3 hours ago PK’s defense was great until it mattered. That’s why he’s gone. End of story. Quote
Here for the Wins Posted 2 hours ago Posted 2 hours ago On 7/23/2026 at 10:26 AM, Alex Butler said: That TD at half wasn’t prevent it was actually an agressive play call with Gilbeau blitzing and them able to get the screen out to the vacated space from the aggressiveness. That plus horrible angles created that score. Prevent actually SHOULD have been the call in that situation. I do think Guilbeau blitzed but the opposite side defender dropped so still only rushing 4. I could be wrong on that. Angles were a problem. You’re the first I recall mentioning this so kudos to you. Players need to make plays. I’d classify this play as one of those. Guilbeau should be aware that a screen is very possible on that play. On the back end, we had one guy let him get outside while at the same time taking out another one of ours. 1 Quote
Here for the Wins Posted 2 hours ago Posted 2 hours ago On 7/24/2026 at 10:50 AM, mmdaytontexas said: I don't think we will see overall a whole lot better defense this year than we saw last year, but I think we will be better as a team because our offense will be a little more consistent in maintaining drives and scoring TDs in the red zone. Sark wants complementary football. I hope the offense does its part and he finally gets it. I think we’ll return to top 10. Muschamp can take some credit, but personnel on defense is much more prepared this year. Last year, DT was a question mark with limited big play ability. All the key parts are back. And hope is that Justus brings some plays. Simmons should be better. Zina, Jackson better. LBer similar but Biles adds a bit more versatility. Then the maturity of the DBs takes a pretty solid jump. And absolutely the improved offense makes life easier for the D. Taaffe, Hill, Manny all missed games last year. January too. McDonald missed the majority of Vandy. So whatever we started with took some hits. 10 hours ago, GQ03 said: The defens had much better personnel. Had pre-season All-American gamebreakers at every level of the defense while the offense had none of that. Sark made the DC change to add what the defense was missing but also brought in Coleman, Smothers, Raleek, Siani, Seymore & Masunas to add what Sark believes the offense Quote
Dread-headed Texan Posted 1 hour ago Posted 1 hour ago Go watch Indiana against Ohio State vs Texas against Ohio State and notice the difference between how the Buckeye quarterback played. At some point you have to stop waiting for the QB to make a mistake and force him to make it. PK didn't do that and that why in all but one year his pass defenses were below average. Not to mention he could never marry the front to the backend 2 1 Quote
Here for the Wins Posted 10 minutes ago Posted 10 minutes ago 1 hour ago, Dread-headed Texan said: Go watch Indiana against Ohio State vs Texas against Ohio State and notice the difference between how the Buckeye quarterback played. At some point you have to stop waiting for the QB to make a mistake and force him to make it. PK didn't do that and that why in all but one year his pass defenses were below average. Not to mention he could never marry the front to the backend Texas had more sacks per game and more interceptions per game than Indiana. His pass defenses were not below average. That is a complete and utter disregard for applying any context. Now to the specific example. Sayin threw a pick versus Indiana drive 1. Then proceeded to throw for 245 yards with no interceptions subsequent to that. J Smith did more in that game than two versus Texas combined. On a 4th and 1 from the IU 5. Play by play shows that was overturned on a Sayin run. Then OSU missed a game tying 27 yard FG. I guess that’s the defense taking it to him. Id say those two defensive performances were comparable given the contexts. Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.