GoHorns1 Posted 15 hours ago Posted 15 hours ago 4 minutes ago, Joe Zura said: Beyond soft by Sankey Following orders from SEC school Presidents who are his boss. Quote
hookem1014 Posted 14 hours ago Posted 14 hours ago 17 minutes ago, GoHorns1 said: Following orders from SEC school Presidents who are his boss. There’s 16 SEC schools. 15 of them voted in favor of the penalties. 1 Quote
Dawson Yarbrough Posted 14 hours ago Posted 14 hours ago If I understand correctly, SEC is basically saying they can’t legally stop pro players from being rostered. BUT, Those teams will be subject to penalties discussed the other day during the meetings where they voted. it’s a game of legal chicken. Hearing on Thursday. 3 Quote
thatdude2 Posted 14 hours ago Posted 14 hours ago A lot of holding calls going against teams that do this though. 1 Quote
MBHORNSFAN Posted 14 hours ago Posted 14 hours ago This was always the outcome. Everything else was fodder. Quote
Ryan Clement Posted 13 hours ago Posted 13 hours ago 49 minutes ago, Dawson Yarbrough said: If I understand correctly, SEC is basically saying they can’t legally stop pro players from being rostered. BUT, Those teams will be subject to penalties discussed the other day during the meetings where they voted. it’s a game of legal chicken. Hearing on Thursday. So if LSU brings any of those players onto their team they will face the penalties by the SEC? Like forfeit of games and fines? Quote
.45s Posted 13 hours ago Posted 13 hours ago 9 minutes ago, Ryan Clement said: So if LSU brings any of those players onto their team they will face the penalties by the SEC? Like forfeit of games and fines? That judgment seems to say that they can't punish anyone (schools, coaches, etc.) for bringing in those players. Quote
Ryan Clement Posted 13 hours ago Posted 13 hours ago 3 minutes ago, .45s said: That judgment seems to say that they can't punish anyone (schools, coaches, etc.) for bringing in those players. So basically the SEC tried to make a stand and immediately had to walk that back? 2 Quote
Lock n Horns Posted 13 hours ago Posted 13 hours ago Can you comply by allowing it but still impose SEC penalties because you have ur own rules? Quote
Colby TS Posted 13 hours ago Posted 13 hours ago People keep saying, “At least after this year, this won’t happen again.” And as far as NFL players coming back to college, I agree—that probably won’t happen again. My question is: what happens when a player from the 2023, 2024 or 2025 recruiting class goes before a judge and says, “But Judge, I only played four games during my redshirt season. I didn’t actually get a full five years of playing eligibility.” It seems to me like this issue may not be completely settled yet. The NFL-to-college situation may be over, but I wouldn’t be surprised if there are still more eligibility challenges ahead. 3 Quote
Connor Vaughn Posted 11 hours ago Posted 11 hours ago I thought Sankey was supposed to be better than Yormark……..what a spineless coward 3 Quote
tsip92 Posted 11 hours ago Posted 11 hours ago Unfortunately, and I hate this, this is probably why we’re going to have to have federal intervention, because the judiciary is rewriting the rules on a weekly basis. It’s complete chaos. Quote
.45s Posted 11 hours ago Posted 11 hours ago 1 hour ago, Ryan Clement said: So basically the SEC tried to make a stand and immediately had to walk that back? Yes. It's a mad, mad, mad, mad world! 1 Quote
garythesnail Posted 11 hours ago Posted 11 hours ago 1 hour ago, Colby TS said: People keep saying, “At least after this year, this won’t happen again.” And as far as NFL players coming back to college, I agree—that probably won’t happen again. My question is: what happens when a player from the 2023, 2024 or 2025 recruiting class goes before a judge and says, “But Judge, I only played four games during my redshirt season. I didn’t actually get a full five years of playing eligibility.” It seems to me like this issue may not be completely settled yet. The NFL-to-college situation may be over, but I wouldn’t be surprised if there are still more eligibility challenges ahead. IIRC the athlete has to choose which model works best for them, they can choose to adopt the 5 for 5 model, or keep the previous model, whichever is more beneficial to the athlete. I think that argument in court won't be as easy. Quote
Jarveaux Posted 10 hours ago Posted 10 hours ago 4 hours ago, Joe Zura said: Beyond soft by Sankey I agree Joe Z . This is ridiculous. Bijon take a year off we need you Quote
Moderators Hank South Posted 10 hours ago Author Moderators Posted 10 hours ago 4 hours ago, Dawson Yarbrough said: If I understand correctly, SEC is basically saying they can’t legally stop pro players from being rostered. BUT, Those teams will be subject to penalties discussed the other day during the meetings where they voted. it’s a game of legal chicken. Hearing on Thursday. yep 1 Quote
Moderators Hank South Posted 10 hours ago Author Moderators Posted 10 hours ago 3 hours ago, Ryan Clement said: So basically the SEC tried to make a stand and immediately had to walk that back? For the time being with the hopes they can then go after teams that do it once they (the SEC) wins in court. 2 Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.