Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
6 minutes ago, Austalgia said:

We will be fine with Smothers . He made some people miss, but Oline got man handled by supposedly inferior athletes.  I don’t  care what we were running.  Actually, that’s not true, we can scheme and maybe do better, but we shouldn’t  have to, should we? 

5 guys can’t block 8 no matter how good of of an O line you have. Loaded box- take the passing completions. 
 

There will be many more exotic looks, 7 man blocking schemes, etc next week. 
 

Posted
4 hours ago, Neil Leininger said:

An offense like Texas State is like facing the triple option. You get through it, and move on. Though I think Tennessee runs a version of it, but not to the extremes that Texas State does.

THIS is true. Texas St version is a nightmare to defend.

 

Posted
4 hours ago, Jeff Howe said:

They were definitely not trying to get beat deep.

Exactly. It looked that way. Keep everything in front of you. People forget how good Texas St receivers are. They are fast too. 

Posted

Agree with you about the forced pass for the INT from Arch. Just not a smart play. But apart from that, felt like he did a great job. Run game kind of teetered off through out the game.

Defensively, they gave up some plays but it looked worse than it was. There wasn't much to the D, they just kind of got physical and took it to Texas State. 

Expect Biles to be all over the field next week giving Ohio State O fits. 

Posted
16 minutes ago, AusMOJO said:

Agree with you about the forced pass for the INT from Arch. Just not a smart play. But apart from that, felt like he did a great job. Run game kind of teetered off through out the game.

Defensively, they gave up some plays but it looked worse than it was. There wasn't much to the D, they just kind of got physical and took it to Texas State. 

Expect Biles to be all over the field next week giving Ohio State O fits. 

It was a bad decision, but he threaded the needle to Wingo the play before for what should have been a TD. The sack on the same drive was also a really bad decision in what a great game for him overall. That was like a 20 yard loss in rushing yards, becase he easily had at least 10 yards if he had just ran the ball.

  • Hook 'Em 1
Posted
4 hours ago, Schindler86 said:

Nick Townsend was a beast blocking.  A few missed assignments or late to an assignment in the secondary allowed for Texas State to move the ball a bit.  Mascoe missed a tackle on sparks early and then gave too much cushion on third down.  Jelani was late with deep help a couple times for Kade Phillips.  Arch still too often overlooks the “correct” decision and instead forces it where it doesn’t need to be. A couple times he got away with it but he needs to tighten up.  Interior lineman struggled as the game went on to open up lanes inside.  Sterling Berkhalter looked great.  Wingo almost had an exceptional day but just had a great one.  If he finds a way to make that catch in the back of the end zone.  Smothers and Brown looked like solid, smart running backs.  Coleman and Wingo blocked their butts off downfield.  Mosely had a quiet day, holding call and dropped ball on a poor pass from Arch.  The middle of the field was wide open for Texas State.

- Texas needs to shore up the interior line run locking.  Assignments in the secondary.  Not over pursuing on the edge and allowing qb rush lane when there is man coverage (Simmons).  Arch needs to more consistently make the right decision rather than the “would that be awesome if this worked” decision.  They need to get set up faster defensively.  They couldn’t get set up a couple times with up tempo and were subject to interior runs.

lots to work on but that QB was pretty dang good and so were a couple of those receivers.

The score was 59-7.

Posted
1 hour ago, Neil Leininger said:

It was a bad decision, but he threaded the needle to Wingo the play before for what should have been a TD. The sack on the same drive was also a really bad decision in what a great game for him overall. That was like a 20 yard loss in rushing yards, becase he easily had at least 10 yards if he had just ran the ball.

Yeah I recall the sack you're talking about, he hesitated on whether to run or not. The defender gave him the ultimatum. He had another pass, I believe the 2nd TD for Coleman, that he threaded really well. 

 

Posted

My two biggest takeaways are that the OL seemed more athletic and better at the point of attack, and the defense was much more aggressive. The OL will only get better as they gel together, and get in “game shape”. Muschamp will be able to get more complex with his game plans as the defense grows, younger guys get more run, and everyone understands their assignments better. 
 

Overall, in a much better place to start the year than last year. Remember that UTEP gave us a hard time. Next week’s message is challenging their physicality to set a tone for the season, and can they overcome one of the big bad wolves in tOSU. 

Posted
10 hours ago, Neil Leininger said:

An offense like Texas State is like facing the triple option. You get through it, and move on. Though I think Tennessee runs a version of it, but not to the extremes that Texas State does.

Tennessee & Mississippi State both run the Veer & Shoot.  Lebby is Art Briles’ SIL.  

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.