Former Sark QB - Arch film study

[Nate C]

 

[Bobby Burton]

This is the best video I've seen on this topic. No hyperbole. No yelling, Just describing.

[Gerry Hamilton]

1 hour ago, Nate C said:

 

Thank you for the link 

[ChanmanV]

Good stuff. The film says it all. The first play is the one I've been saying is the most indicative of his failing and the guy does a great job of analyzing it.

I think it's worth rewatching games and analyzing last year to see if we were giving Arch too much credit for some throws that might have been more lucky that anything else. This whole Arch thing makes me feel gaslit by Sark. I suspect this has been an issue for a long time but his legs and miraculous throws and catches have tempered the fire. 

[Jbro52]

He has some pretty good videos even one going over his time in Sarks offense 

[.45s]

Very informative review and analysis.

[mmdaytontexas]

That was awesome 

1 hour ago, Nate C said:

 

That was awesome Nate. Thanks for sharing. I didn't realize there were that many receivers that wide open. Arch is bad, but the OL doesn't get a pass. They were pretty bad at times too. What in the hell were these two OL doing on this play?

[MBHORNSFAN]

Woof. 

[ThatHornsGuy87]

We need Sabans sport psychiatrist on campus! He needs to be rewired. Something upstairs is broken. I hate it for the kid

[SimGent]

I'm biased as a San Francisco fan but when Arch decides to return the person I would like him to call is Brock Purdy to pick his brain on processing and playing in a system that schemes a lot open and gives you multiple answers offensively.