Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted (edited)
12 minutes ago, Realist Horn said:

With Fenves going there as president, will he make a move for Del Conte?

 

 

Hartzell* went there to be the President. Hopefully he doesn’t try to recruit CDC but I won’t be surprised if he does given their relationship. 

Edited by TexasLonghorns
  • Hook 'Em 4
  • Haha 1
  • Sad 1
Posted

Wouldn't that be a step down?

I understand that Hartzell went due to the overly political nature of the UT-president position and having to kowtow to so many people.  SMU is private, so it's just his Board (no legislature, etc).

 

 

Posted

As much as we love The University of Texas as a school, it does not have objective claim as the best college in America. So as the president of UT, you can’t say you’re leading the best college in America.

In contrast, as frequent winner/contender for the Director’s Cup, UT Athletics does have objective claim as the best college athletic department in the country. 
 

So if CDC leaves Texas for SMU, it would be leaving arguably the best athletics department in the country for a department at SMU that doesn’t frequently compete for titles in major sports (if any).

That would be a perplexing move

  • Hook 'Em 3
Posted
1 hour ago, TexasLonghorns said:

Hartzell* went there to be the President. Hopefully he doesn’t try to recruit CDC but I won’t be surprised if he does given their relationship. 

He'll try but CDC ain't going nowhere. Man has the best job in America. 

  • Hook 'Em 1
Posted
2 hours ago, CHorn427 said:

As much as we love The University of Texas as a school, it does not have objective claim as the best college in America. So as the president of UT, you can’t say you’re leading the best college in America.

In contrast, as frequent winner/contender for the Director’s Cup, UT Athletics does have objective claim as the best college athletic department in the country. 
 

So if CDC leaves Texas for SMU, it would be leaving arguably the best athletics department in the country for a department at SMU that doesn’t frequently compete for titles in major sports (if any).

That would be a perplexing move

Well said 

  • Hook 'Em 2
Posted
2 hours ago, TexasLonghorns said:

Hartzell* went there to be the President. Hopefully he doesn’t try to recruit CDC but I won’t be surprised if he does given their relationship. 

Correct - I’m dating myself with Fenves. 

  • Hook 'Em 1
Posted
8 hours ago, TexasLonghorns said:

Hartzell* went there to be the President. Hopefully he doesn’t try to recruit CDC but I won’t be surprised if he does given their relationship. 

If it was Fenves CDC would give him the old Tommy H double bird. Hartzell, would be smart to try but I don’t think they have a big enough dept for CDC to really want that job. 

Posted
8 hours ago, chennups said:

Wouldn't that be a step down?

I understand that Hartzell went due to the overly political nature of the UT-president position and having to kowtow to so many people.  SMU is private, so it's just his Board (no legislature, etc).

 

 

Your assumption is not true.   Hartzell left because he got paid tons more to be at SMU.   
 

  • Haha 1
Posted
12 hours ago, CHorn427 said:

As much as we love The University of Texas as a school, it does not have objective claim as the best college in America. So as the president of UT, you can’t say you’re leading the best college in America.

In contrast, as frequent winner/contender for the Director’s Cup, UT Athletics does have objective claim as the best college athletic department in the country. 
 

So if CDC leaves Texas for SMU, it would be leaving arguably the best athletics department in the country for a department at SMU that doesn’t frequently compete for titles in major sports (if any).

That would be a perplexing move

Agree.   Can’t see any logical reason especially now that UT football has built so much momentum and is set to go on a run the next 5 yrs.   
 

Also, have you been to SMU’s stadium?   Holds 32000.   
 

 

IMG_7152.png

Posted
19 hours ago, chennups said:

Wouldn't that be a step down?

I understand that Hartzell went due to the overly political nature of the UT-president position and having to kowtow to so many people.  SMU is private, so it's just his Board (no legislature, etc).

 

 

One school conservative & other Liberal. 

Posted

The typical run of a college president, especially at a public U. is 5 years.  This regardless of how well loved one might be.

There are relatively benign institutional factors that underlay this timetable.  You could research this yourself, I am merely reporting the standard result.

  • Hook 'Em 1
Posted

It doesn’t make sense to leave a small private school to go to a larger school like Texas which has one of the biggest Athletic departments and relatively unlimited resources. SMU had to buy their way into the ACC.  
 

How big can SMU’s budget be when you factor in the deal they made to get into the ACC vs. traveling cost, facility upgrades, coaches etc. Don’t forget NIL deals and possible revenue sharing deal.  More of a headache.

At Texas you are played well and no shortage of financial means.  Boosters and fans can be a problem at any school so that shouldn’t be any issues.

 


 

 

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.