Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

College ball is year round. It’s a grind. I think Sark just wants to coach and call plays. 
 

I don't see it with Freeman. Don’t think he’s great. I’d take Kiffin with PK before Freeman. That’s just me. 
 

I also think Dillingham gets interviewed. 

  • Hook 'Em 1
Posted
16 minutes ago, coltonmartinez said:

Honestly man I would believe in PK if he wanted a shot as a HC. I know it’s not what’s normally done but his defense has been the strength and identity of this program for the last couple of years

It could work if he gave up defensive playcalling and has a home run hire at OC

  • Hook 'Em 1
Posted
1 minute ago, Gerry Hamilton said:

Your Number 3 is interesting. Not sure they would potentially hurt Sark like that, but could be mistaken. 

 

I think when you sign up with an agent like sexton that controls the market of big name coaches you know he will use the leverage he has for his collective of coaches and what’s good for one guy is good for the collective in that situation. Agree if this is really the angle that it hurts sark in the short term but it will help long term. Doesn’t sark have a rider in his contract that keeps him within the top X of coaching salaries?  I might be mistaken. 

Posted

If this was furing thr offseason, id be 100% onnoard that sark and sexton leaked this.  During the season though?  This feels fugazi.  Someone is trying to play fames with sark and texas.  Sark badly wants a natty as an hc. 

  • Moderators
Posted
2 minutes ago, Connor Vaughn said:

Freeman wouldn’t work here. I could very easily see that being a Charlie Strong 2.0 situation. Hasn’t his defense taken a huge step back this year? What am I missing? 

Those two couldn’t be further apart 

  • Hook 'Em 9
Posted
56 minutes ago, Red Five said:

I wonder if this is a public negotiation tactic with CDC re: hiring an OC. 

Either way, something has been very, very off all season. We are historically bad on offense and that is unacceptable with what we are paying our HC and OC. If this continued into next season then leaving wouldn't be Sark's choice to make. 

He's not getting a raise so I'm not sure what the negotiation would be.

  • Hook 'Em 3
  • Moderators
Posted
3 minutes ago, Quinncent McManning, Jr. said:

I think when you sign up with an agent like sexton that controls the market of big name coaches you know he will use the leverage he has for his collective of coaches and what’s good for one guy is good for the collective in that situation. Agree if this is really the angle that it hurts sark in the short term but it will help long term. Doesn’t sark have a rider in his contract that keeps him within the top X of coaching salaries?  I might be mistaken. 

During the middle of the season when Texas is struggling on O … that def doesn’t help Sark 

  • Hook 'Em 4
Posted

I wasn't expecting this, but it makes sense.

Texas fans hear from Sark after Spring football and August camp how excited he is, yada, yada...

Team never has looked right after Ohio State.

Something's seriously "off," because it's hard to fathom such a precipitous fall by the Offense and the whole thing is collapsing.

Sark is great with great roster and playing in the final four, etc..

Not so great when things got difficult this season.

Wasn't expecting this, but it might explain a lot.

 

Hook 'Em!

Posted
7 minutes ago, Gerry Hamilton said:

Your Number 3 is interesting. Not sure they would potentially hurt Sark like that, but could be mistaken. 

 

Jimmy Sexton is telling CDC Sark is going to the NFL, BUT i happen to have another client that you might be interested in but it’s going to take $20 large to get him. LOL.  Hey cut me some slack it’s a rainy day waiting on the game. 

  • Haha 1
Posted
8 minutes ago, Connor Vaughn said:

Freeman wouldn’t work here. I could very easily see that being a Charlie Strong 2.0 situation.

Just a little racist, imo. 

  • Hook 'Em 4
  • Haha 1
  • Confused 1
Posted
8 minutes ago, Connor Vaughn said:

Freeman wouldn’t work here. I could very easily see that being a Charlie Strong 2.0 situation. Hasn’t his defense taken a huge step back this year? What am I missing? 

Strong never, even as a HC at Louisville, had the success Freeman has.

Posted
7 minutes ago, Bobby Burton said:

No. First, no single booster speaks for Texas these days. Furthermore, her sources are NFL related.

What's your theory on her timing?

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.