OTF Premium Arch Manning must keep thriving against pressure when Texas faces Georgia

[PaulieD]

16 hours ago, Rocky P said:

his ability to complete a pass while getting absolutely destroyed is impressive.  We expect the elusiveness with the legs, but that toughness to stand in the pocket and be able to deliver while taking them big boy hits is elite.

GREAT focus on his part.

[Here for the Wins]

5 hours ago, DanielOnorato said:

They definitely have great athletes but they are new athletes, developing athletes. Id stick with the last five which is the best I think Texas has to offer. Goosby, Hutson, Robertson, Campbell and Baker. 

Id prefer stroh over Brooks at guard. I think connor Stroh is a better guard than Nick Brooks no doubt about it.

DO, I’m with you here.   The LG position has presented the biggest question all season.  Neto is one part of it but also no Robertson, particularly given Hutsons work having been at Guard leading into the season.  The Brooks decision makes little sense and even less so now.   I’d go Stroh over Brooks if we need to play one.

[HTXHorn]

Currently watching the UGA/Miss St game and Georgia just recorded their 9th sack of the season. 
 

Their. 9th. Sack.

I’m more concerned that our secondary is healthy and the pass defense shows up. 

Edited yesterday at 05:21 PM by HTXHorn

[Beldar]

Georgia looked a lot like the Georgia we know. They destroyed 
State today.

 

[thatdude2]

Why would you blitz Arch after looking at those numbers? It’s better to simulate pressure and disguise coverages

Edited 13 hours ago by thatdude2

[diegozanna20]

4 hours ago, thatdude2 said:

Why would you blitz Arch after looking at those numbers? It’s better to simulate pressure and disguise coverages

That's what OSU did right? 
I suspect that's what georgia is going to do.
Unless you can bring 2+ free rushers in his face when blitizing it makes no sense to blitz Arch.
He's not really affected by pressure, especially if it comes from a single guy.

[diegozanna20]

Just now, diegozanna20 said:

That's what OSU did right? 
I suspect that's what georgia is going to do.
Unless you can bring 2+ free rushers in his face when blitizing it makes no sense to blitz Arch.
He's not really affected by pressure, especially if it comes from a single guy.

I will say that Georgia does not have the personell that OSU does.
They got guys but they can definitely be had in the secondary.

[AusMOJO]

22 minutes ago, diegozanna20 said:

I will say that Georgia does not have the personell that OSU does.
They got guys but they can definitely be had in the secondary.

Georgia is lacking on the DL compared to last year, their LB's are still good but not as good as last years group. Two of their guys had like 8-9 of their 13 sacks against us. Secondary for them is a weak point and banged up. They also lost one of their best DL for the season last week, I believe.

In saying that, Kirby Smart is a great coach, despite what people think of him and he'll have something dialed up to get his team over the hump and make it difficult. I'm not worried about what they've done so far, compared to what they'll do against us. 

Plus it's in Athen's, we haven't played well on the road this year at all. We're a Stoops bad decision and miraculous come back from being 0-4 on the road this year. I truly hope things have turned the corner, but we'll see. They got a week to get everyone rested and healed up, which will help, imo. I also think they have the current best group of OL out there right now, just a shame it took them this long to figure it out.

Moving Milwee back to the booth seems to have helped Sark stop forcing something that isn't working. 

[SchoolColors]

5 hours ago, thatdude2 said:

Why would you blitz Arch after looking at those numbers? It’s better to simulate pressure and disguise coverages

Depends on what offense we run. If we run Sarks traditional offense that’s more compact and tight you can do both effectively because it’s easier to do so. If he’s running the more spread offense that he ran vs Vandy which fits our personnel better it’s harder for teams to simulate the pressure because they can’t disguise it as well

[GQ03]

4 hours ago, SchoolColors said:

Depends on what offense we run. If we run Sarks traditional offense that’s more compact and tight you can do both effectively because it’s easier to do so. If he’s running the more spread offense that he ran vs Vandy which fits our personnel better it’s harder for teams to simulate the pressure because they can’t disguise it as well

I would think Sark leans more on the game plan we used in the SEC Championship game where we threw the ball a ton with targets to motion and had much more success moving the ball downfield. Hopefully, Arch's legs & a better fg kicker lead to more than 6 pts after outgaining Georgia by 200 yds.

[SchoolColors]

24 minutes ago, GQ03 said:

I would think Sark leans more on the game plan we used in the SEC Championship game where we threw the ball a ton with targets to motion and had much more success moving the ball downfield. Hopefully, Arch's legs & a better fg kicker lead to more than 6 pts after outgaining Georgia by 200 yds.

I personally hope we run nothing from either Georgia game last year because it didn’t really work and won’t work with this team. 

[GQ03]

1 hour ago, SchoolColors said:

I personally hope we run nothing from either Georgia game last year because it didn’t really work and won’t work with this team. 

In the championship game, we went up and down the field on them but couldn't finish in the red zone. Ole Miss has fasted on spreading Georgia out and hitting them in the middle of the field where the linebackers have vacated and then working them over with timely QB runs.

[SchoolColors]

2 minutes ago, GQ03 said:

In the championship game, we went up and down the field on them but couldn't finish in the red zone. Ole Miss has fasted on spreading Georgia out and hitting them in the middle of the field where the linebackers have vacated and then working them over with timely QB runs.

Early on we did, yes. But as a whole we didn’t.