Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

So if he was gambling at Indiana, wouldn't that be a crime for underage gambling? Didn't Hunter Dekkers get his eligibility taken for that? The legal age for gambling in Indiana is 21 and I highly doubt he was 21 as a freshman.

  • Hook 'Em 1
Posted
1 minute ago, Deep in the heart said:

So if he was gambling at Indiana, wouldn't that be a crime for underage gambling? Didn't Hunter Dekkers get his eligibility taken for that? The legal age for gambling in Indiana is 21 and I highly doubt he was 21 as a freshman.

Yup! I think it was @Gerry Hamilton that suggested Dekker’s Sue for damages after this whole Sorsby thing because his gambling paled in comparison to Sorsby. He’s not wrong at all. 

  • Hook 'Em 2
Posted

This reminds me of the Baylor rape situation.   Totally mismanaged by the board.  
 

I have to check out the board of directions to see if they have a true adult adult in the room.  The whole mess was completely predictable.   Oil and gas founders are gutty and brilliant and rich and they deserve all of that…but I am not sure they can’t see around corners that are not lubricated with petroleum.   

Posted
1 hour ago, Horns05 said:

They had never positioned themselves for inclusion.  

They’ve actually positioned themselves for EXCLUSION in my opinion. The blatant disregard for rules and moral relativism and hypocrisy will make sure no one wants to invite them to the party ever again. 

  • Hook 'Em 2
Posted
19 minutes ago, Colby TS said:

At the 8:40 mark, Cody Campbell makes the statement: "They(Texas Tech) have a contract to not only pay him, but to play him. So how do we not play a kid when we're contractually obligated to do so and a court has ruled that he's eligible to play?"

Maybe I'm flat out wrong but it would be shocking to me if NIL agreements actually contained provisions requiring a player to be given playing time. Coaches make lineup decisions all the time, and I can't imagine a contract legally obligating a school to put a specific player on the field.

 

I thought nil contracts couldn’t be “pay for play”.  Seems like tech continues to operate as if there are no rules and then they blame the current system if they are caught by saying current system is the issue, not their thread to not follow existing rules. 

  • Thanks 1
Posted
34 minutes ago, CJ Vogel said:

 

Then add the sanctioned that followed, such as: 5 year probation, $60M to go towards helping those with gambling addictions, 4 year postseason ban, and severe scholarship reductions.  I mean, if he wants equal treatment to Penn St.

  • Hook 'Em 1
Posted (edited)
18 minutes ago, Jedi Master Bevo said:

Then add the sanctioned that followed, such as: 5 year probation, $60M to go towards helping those with gambling addictions, 4 year postseason ban, and severe scholarship reductions.  I mean, if he wants equal treatment to Penn St.

3 hours ago, Rocky P said:

 

 

Watching Finebaum, Levine, the president of the Yankees , the guy that Trump put in charge of fixing college sports, was saying Campbell was the savior of college sports. We are screwed. Campbell is a stage four cancer on college athletics. 

 

Edited by Beldar
Posted

I hope Cody and TTech continue to double down. It’ll damage the program and brand even more so. It doesn’t even matter what courts say when the ENTIRE public is against them. It’s crazy to watch them daily digging their own grave even deeper. 

  • Hook 'Em 2
Posted
4 hours ago, CJ Vogel said:

Hocutt: "To my colleagues: I understand the frustration. This situation is hard, it is new and there is no perfect answer."

Does this same level of care and support apply to all students at TT that have come forward with an addiction?  Do other universities offer this extensive level of addiction care?  Or maybe TT is doing it and charging him for it (which is probably not the case since they don't say they are). 

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.