Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

Seriously what is the point of having rules if you can just appeal them. Might as well just start bringing NFL players back to college and take it to the courts if the NCAA says they’re ineligible 

Posted
Just now, smokeyiii said:

Everyone on Tech's schedule should tell them to pound sand. Can't make the CFB with a 0-0 record. Maybe the Big 12 will do something but seriously doubt it.

I doubt the Big 12 will do anything at all. Tech appears to be Yormark's BFF's.

  • Hook 'Em 3
Posted
Just now, smokeyiii said:

Everyone on Tech's schedule should tell them to pound sand. Can't make the CFB with a 0-0 record. Maybe the Big 12 will do something but seriously doubt it.

The Big 12 has doubled down with Tech, they are in cahoots together. It's obvious why....(cough) Campbell... (cough, cough)... money.

  • Hook 'Em 2
Posted
1 minute ago, hookem1014 said:

Seriously what is the point of having rules if you can just appeal them. Might as well just start bringing NFL players back to college and take it to the courts if the NCAA says they’re ineligible 

This is literally what is happening in college basketball 😂 such a joke 

  • Sad 1
Posted
7 minutes ago, Lock n Horns said:

Can the NCAA say fine you can play but your program is not allowed to participate in the playoffs?  I guess that makes no sense because he wasnt at Texh during the period of time in question

No, the NCAA can’t ban Tech from the playoff over something that happened before he ever got there. That’s not how their bylaws work.

But they don’t need to. The NCAA has a much simpler hammer: if he’s ruled ineligible and Tech plays him anyway, every game he steps on the field becomes a forfeiture. That’s the real leverage, and it applies no matter what county courthouse tries to protect him.

  • Hook 'Em 2
Posted
1 minute ago, georgethepunter said:

The CFP committee should just say if Sorsby plays, Tech cannot make the playoffs. Simple as that. 

In enters Cody Campbell and a bag of cash. This still doesn't fix the root issue in that whenever I see my team do something absolutely boneheaded that I won't question if there was gambling happening.

  • Haha 1
Posted
9 minutes ago, Lock n Horns said:

Can the NCAA say fine you can play but your program is not allowed to participate in the playoffs?  I guess that makes no sense because he wasnt at Texh during the period of time in question

Yes he was. He was betting on sports at Tech.

  • Hook 'Em 2
Posted

The NCAA should file an injunction saying they will face imminent and irreparable damage if Sorsby plays this year.  
 

The world we live in is so f’d up.  

  • Hook 'Em 2
  • Haha 1
Posted
18 minutes ago, birdlaw5895 said:

What can you not do if you can bet on your own games 

This is the question all of us should be asking. I asked on C&F this morning but the chat was crazy because of the news. Besides gambling, now the rev share agreement”rules” do not apply. Players can claim “damage” if they don’t get the package they want. Teams can pay well above the 20m range now. I suggest UT consider this before they lose their recruits to Tech. Schools now know they can get a judge to get them out of anything. 

  • Hook 'Em 1
Posted
5 minutes ago, Roy Hinojosa said:

In enters Cody Campbell and a bag of cash. This still doesn't fix the root issue in that whenever I see my team do something absolutely boneheaded that I won't question if there was gambling happening.

Cody Campbell pops up so reliably with a money bag I’m convinced his LinkedIn just says ‘Professional Cash Appearance" 😄

  • Haha 1
Posted

A lot of GAs and “walk ons” about to make some serious cash this season if this holds. Like someone on a livestream said how quickly are assistant coaches or someone gonna just bet on player catches and force feed them the ball to make some NIL cash. Just way too much insider stuff capable of going on with this player prop sites 

  • Hook 'Em 3
Posted
43 minutes ago, Hookem1012 said:

Horseshit

Haha it’s an insult to horse$hit everywhere, it doesn’t even want to be associated with this trash. @CJ Vogel or one of our lawyers on the forum, what are the NCAA’s next steps? I’m sure they’re going to appeal to get it out of west Texas courts, but could they ban tech and Sorsby from participating in post season activities? I can’t believe we’re at this stage in college sports where this is even happening. 

Posted
4 minutes ago, Dawson Yarbrough said:

This is the question all of us should be asking. I asked on C&F this morning but the chat was crazy because of the news. Besides gambling, now the rev share agreement”rules” do not apply. Players can claim “damage” if they don’t get the package they want. Teams can pay well above the 20m range now. I suggest UT consider this before they lose their recruits to Tech. Schools now know they can get a judge to get them out of anything. 

Yes I agree it’s a horrible precedent being set if it stands. My hope is that this precipitates rapid change in college sports and how teams, players, coaches, and schools are governed and disciplined for infractions. 

  • Thanks 1
Posted

Thinking this might lead to 1) an expedited SEC/Big10 super conference with its own enforcement of rules, and 2) the guaranteed exclusion of Texas Tech from the list of teams that are added to the conference. 

  • Hook 'Em 3

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.