Aspann85 Posted yesterday at 02:12 PM Posted yesterday at 02:12 PM 25 minutes ago, Here for the Wins said: Akina was an odd choice. I was not here so no idea if there was discussion regarding the whys of bringing him back. I thought he and Nansen were familiar with each other and was likely a positive in bringing Akina back. For much of 2024, the schedule had offensive incompetence on the opposite sideline. There’s a reason Clemson, ASU and OSU had some success. We also were relatively healthy in 2024. Good health, simplistic offenses, limited offenses generally make for easier defense. UTSA, Colo State, ULM were all in the 100s in OFEI. Michigan was 61. OU was 80. Florida was 49, but that was built on Lagway. The Ivy League transfer likely has them worse. Kentucky was 73. Mississippi State was 31, but they did have a backup QB making his first start. Georgia was 13 so that was for a decent offense. Vandy was 27, Arkansas 48. A&M 29th. So those first 5 P5 teams were either unsettled at QB or had injured QBs when we played. in 2025, the non-P5s were in the 100s. Vandy 1st. Ohio State 8th. Georgia 9th. a&M 15th. Arkansas 16th. MSU 42nd. OU 54th. UF 61st. Kentucky 84th. So the P4 teams that got worse in OFEI were home games in 2024 and road games in 2025. Two of those were also the 3rd and 4th games in a row away from home. Also two of the 3 started backup QBs in 2024. Akina wasn’t an odd choice. Akina is man coverage aggressive style secondary and that didn’t mesh with PK’s defense. I bet Akina’s secondary does well this year if he is given the opportunity to run the style of secondary he likes. Quote
GoHorns1 Posted yesterday at 02:17 PM Posted yesterday at 02:17 PM 7 minutes ago, Aspann85 said: I’m not so sure about that since he said Muschamp is the head coach of the defense when he got here. I think Sark wants to be as hands off on the defense as possible so he can get the offense to the levels he had at Bama. Sark is the HC not Muschamp when it comes to coaching staff and support staff. Muschamp will run the defense game plan and play calling. Quote
Aspann85 Posted yesterday at 02:18 PM Posted yesterday at 02:18 PM 1 minute ago, GoHorns1 said: Sark is the HC not Muschamp when it comes to coaching staff and support staff. Muschamp will run the defense game plan and play calling. Might want to go back and read posts on here and watch interviews about when Muschamp was hired. 1 Quote
jkates Posted yesterday at 02:38 PM Posted yesterday at 02:38 PM 17 minutes ago, Aspann85 said: Might want to go back and read posts on here and watch interviews about when Muschamp was hired. Yes, Sark said he wants Muschamp to be the HC of the defense, but that does not mean that Muschamp operates outside of Sark's plan. Sark sets the plan, style, strategy, pick a word, and gives Muschamp room to execute on it. Believing that Muschamp can do whatever he wants without any Sark input is...something. 1 Quote
Here for the Wins Posted yesterday at 02:51 PM Posted yesterday at 02:51 PM 21 minutes ago, Aspann85 said: Akina wasn’t an odd choice. Akina is man coverage aggressive style secondary and that didn’t mesh with PK’s defense. I bet Akina’s secondary does well this year if he is given the opportunity to run the style of secondary he likes. No one runs man all the time. He’s 70 years old so at best he was a short term solution. His heyday was in a different era that was not predominantly 3-3-5 or 4-2-5. What 15-20 years ago? Defenses have evolved a great deal. From what I see, Arizona was 103 in DFEI in 2024. 14th in 2025. Without looking it up, Stanford wasn’t worth much during his tenure. A dude doesn’t get run after a year of there weren’t signs leading into it. Texas and money. Odd choice. Quote
General Grant Posted yesterday at 02:59 PM Posted yesterday at 02:59 PM 1 hour ago, PaulieD said: If you think this board is bad, @MBHORNSFAN , @General Grant and I can show you a real train wreck of a board 😉 The one run by the guy who never leaves his house? Or the one who should never leave his house (ie impaired driver)? 1 1 Quote
PaulieD Posted yesterday at 03:01 PM Posted yesterday at 03:01 PM (edited) 2 minutes ago, General Grant said: The one run by the guy who never leaves his house? Or the one who should never leave his house (ie impaired driver)? YES. Them be the ones...... Edited yesterday at 03:02 PM by PaulieD 1 Quote
No13Seed Jim Posted yesterday at 04:18 PM Author Posted yesterday at 04:18 PM 2 hours ago, Aspann85 said: I’m not so sure about that since he said Muschamp is the head coach of the defense when he got here. I think Sark wants to be as hands off on the defense as possible so he can get the offense to the levels he had at Bama. My feeling, too. I tend to think Sark will question/challenge Muschamp staff changes but rubber stamp them. 1 Quote
GoHorns1 Posted yesterday at 05:44 PM Posted yesterday at 05:44 PM 1 hour ago, No13Seed Jim said: My feeling, too. I tend to think Sark will question/challenge Muschamp staff changes but rubber stamp them. Sark makes ALL final decisions on staffing. 2 Quote
Here for the Wins Posted 17 hours ago Posted 17 hours ago 13 hours ago, BornOrange said: You think we were overly aggressive against Florida? Some, yes. Two early-ish 3rd downs we blitzed to no avail. Believe that long throw to Brown for 60 was a blitz with a safety brought down. They had some run success early. We brought McDonald down both times from recall. One was in the red zone. The other was press coverage - a first time starter at CB. I get the tendency to drop a safety for the run game. That’s overly aggressive in my book. I’d need to look again at the information, but we blitzed a fairly a high rate to no avail. 40+%. Miami gave UF problems, they weren’t typically a high blitz team. I don’t think LSU did either and made Lagway think. And from my recollection that was one of Lagway quickest average time to throw. My preference is that when you have a Simmons you let him work. Often that is made more difficult when you bring an extra guy or two because the read is easier so the ball is out quick. My view of overly aggressive is likely more subtle than most others view. Quote
akrupa23 Posted 2 hours ago Posted 2 hours ago On 7/5/2026 at 6:06 PM, NothinButDaHorns34 said: This boards full low football IQ “what have you done for me lately” types. Glad NOBODY on here is apart of the hiring/firing process for coaches here. Just gonna add it's not just this board, this is the Longhorn Fanbase (and pretty much all the blue bloods lmao) Quote
Sundancekid Posted 2 hours ago Posted 2 hours ago Nansen is a hell of a coach. His linebackers play as well as any units i have seen in 50 years of watching UT football. 1 Quote
NothinButDaHorns34 Posted 49 minutes ago Posted 49 minutes ago 1 hour ago, akrupa23 said: Just gonna add it's not just this board, this is the Longhorn Fanbase (and pretty much all the blue bloods lmao) Really sports fandom in general. 2 Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.