Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

I know this was about passing, but I was more concerned about the run defense. I feel like we didn’t get great push by our d-line and that’s not good.

  • Hook 'Em 3
Posted

One thing that is hard to judge on these games is truly how hard the team is going especially the D Line. Heavy rotation, probably not going 100%, limited exotics, blitzes, etc. This should help our secondary next week

Posted (edited)

Our secondary looked better than last season.

The emerging Kobe Black and Jonah Williams along with the experience and talent of Jelani McDonald solidified the safety position.  Good to have Gideon back coaching the safety position. Phillips got the most snaps at CB and held up well, only a ticky tack call went against him when the ref was at a bad angle to see the interactions imo. CB Roberson quietly had a pretty good day. CB Mascoe had tackling issues. His coverage was OK but TXSt was just a bit better at times. NB Littleton is proven at NB and had a big play.  CB Mathews played sparingly but he looks the part.

Biles has the athleticism and ball skills to be an asset in pass coverage or effecting the QB blitzing.

Areas of concern in pass defense.

Cryer doesn't have the quickness or speed or change of direction to be a good cover LB. I'm not a fan of moving Colin from rushing the passer at Edge to playing off ball LB.

Edited by Jerky
Posted

Well put it this way, if those same miscues show up next week, Ohio State will turn those in to TD's. Muschamp will know this. They'll also probably blitz more and get after Sayin. Not even sure how many sacks we had against Texas State, felt like 1 but it could've been more. 

Posted (edited)
1 hour ago, Guts said:

I know this was about passing, but I was more concerned about the run defense. I feel like we didn’t get great push by our d-line and that’s not good.

I agree. A lot of times when Tx State needed a yard or 2 they were able to get it. They were 8/14 on third down. We need to continue to have the short yardage stuffing d line we’ve had the past few years. 

Edited by hookem1014
Posted
6 hours ago, Jeff Howe said:

As a college defensive lineman, Suh might've been a once-in-a-lifetime player. As good as guys like Casey Hampton and Tommie Harris were in college, I didn't see anyone do what Suh did before him or since.

Dude might a piece of sh*t but man that dude could just not be blocked or stopped. Even in the league he was hard to stop. 

Posted
4 hours ago, TTown said:

It's time for Simmons to walk the walk Saturday. He got held a lot, but still I was underwhelmed with his play.  But I consider him to be great so expect a lot. And the fact of the quick throws, so expect more of that Sat.  We have to pressure all night  period.

This is a new D so I give the Secondary a B. Saw good and areas we have to clean up. But that's expected. Now it's getting the right personnel for OSU. Can't say how huge this game is. A must win to me considering our schedule. Expect one hell of a game. Cannot lose to them 3 times in a row , so no excuses. 

Well not only do you expect him to be great, he's being  paid a pretty penny for it, too. He wasn't terrible but I just expected to see him dominating better. Hope we see it against Ohio State. 

Posted
4 hours ago, Guts said:

I know this was about passing, but I was more concerned about the run defense. I feel like we didn’t get great push by our d-line and that’s not good.

In fact it felt like the Texas State OL was pushing the DL around, a lot. I know it's only week 1 but I was expecting more from them. Heat is also a factor but still. 

  • Hook 'Em 1
Posted
3 hours ago, Jerky said:

Our secondary looked better than last season.

The emerging Kobe Black and Jonah Williams along with the experience and talent of Jelani McDonald solidified the safety position.  Good to have Gideon back coaching the safety position. Phillips got the most snaps at CB and held up well, only a ticky tack call went against him when the ref was at a bad angle to see the interactions imo. CB Roberson quietly had a pretty good day. CB Mascoe had tackling issues. His coverage was OK but TXSt was just a bit better at times. NB Littleton is proven at NB and had a big play.  CB Mathews played sparingly but he looks the part.

Biles has the athleticism and ball skills to be an asset in pass coverage or effecting the QB blitzing.

Areas of concern in pass defense.

Cryer doesn't have the quickness or speed or change of direction to be a good cover LB. I'm not a fan of moving Colin from rushing the passer at Edge to playing off ball LB.

This is where losing Smith is unfortunate because he could be that guy. Cryer is a good dude, he's just too slow. 

Posted
1 minute ago, AusMOJO said:

In fact it felt like the Texas State OL was pushing the DL around, a lot. I know it's only week 1 but I was expecting more from them. Heat is also a factor but still. 

Texas State didn’t accidentally stumble into yards - they straight‑up moved our front more than they should’ve. Everybody wants to talk about the passing game, but the run defense was the part that actually made me sit up. Our DL wasn’t denting the line, wasn’t striking consistently, and way too often they were catching blocks instead of delivering the first blow. 

Edges were soft, too. They got reach blocks on our DEs like it was a walkthrough. Outside zone, split zone, wide splits - Texas State basically said “let’s make Texas defend space,” and our front didn’t compress it. Young LBs flashed, but the fits weren’t clean, and when your DL isn’t giving you knock‑back, that problem gets magnified.

Yeah, they only scored 7, but don’t kid yourself - they moved the ball because they won leverage. That’s the part that doesn’t translate well when you start playing teams with actual RBs and OLs. If we don’t get more violent at the point of attack, better teams will punish that.

Texas State actually outrushed us.

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.