OTF Premium Three things to consider regarding Laurence Seymore and Texas' left guard competition

[Joe Zura]

2 minutes ago, Jeff Howe said:

Yep. It’s a concern until it’s not.

🤘🤘🤘🤘🤘

[HonkEm]

Wednesday can't get here quick enough 😀

Edited 5 hours ago by HonkEm

[Here for the Wins]

15 minutes ago, JMarquette said:

There’s some truth to this, but Stroh was objectively horrible. This shouldn’t be hard to admit, yet it is for you. Additionally, your description of how the OL works is inaccurate. It’s a “you’re only as strong as your weakest link” type of mentality. You can have 4 studs, but 1 dud ruins it. There were OL problems outside of LG, but the VAST majority was LG.

Stroh’s overall grade was 59.7.  His pass blocking efficiency was 94.7.  Not good but not horrible.  And since he hasn’t played in 3 years, I’d expect growth out him.  Brooks was 36.6 and sub-90.  Drastic differences.  And I don’t fault Brooks, but that’s the biggest head scratcher as to why he played.

CJ also pointed out in the past week that Brooks allowed pressure on 16% of pass plays whereas all others were 6% or lower.  Only one of those was horrible.  Basically the same as efficiency just calculated differently.

So why am I so adamant in defense?  Because the narrative starts off misleading.

Some plays yes.  Some plays no.  Guys miss blocks all the time.  I’d guess it’s much closer to 0% of plays than 100% that all 5 make a block on a given play.  And you know Arch can dodge one on just about any given play.  And versus OSU we had more yards rushing and yards per carry than anyone.   So that doesn’t really compute as to how he screwed that all up.

Ole Miss.  Of their top 5 Olinemen in terms of snap count, two graded lower than Stroh.  You do not get sub-60s by winning every play.  I’m not arguing Stroh is better but rather all the other points.  On any run, that’s at least two guys losing the play.  It didn’t destroy their run game.

 

 

[JMarquette]

18 minutes ago, Jeff Howe said:

In all seriousness, I don’t think this is something that’s that deep. All I’m saying is that I’m willing to let Seymore get through one practice and figure if/when Hutson will be with the team before concerning myself with scenarios that might not happen. 

I get this, but we should have at least 2 guys who should be in front of him. This goes back to the offseason. I like Siani more than Sprauge, but Guarnera almost felt like he was the piece. 

[LonghornFan4Ever]

Hire ASU’s OL coach I guess…

 

[JMarquette]

2 minutes ago, Here for the Wins said:

Stroh’s overall grade was 59.7.  His pass blocking efficiency was 94.7.  Not good but not horrible.  And since he hasn’t played in 3 years, I’d expect growth out him.  Brooks was 36.6 and sub-90.  Drastic differences.  And I don’t fault Brooks, but that’s the biggest head scratcher as to why he played.

CJ also pointed out in the past week that Brooks allowed pressure on 16% of pass plays whereas all others were 6% or lower.  Only one of those was horrible.  Basically the same as efficiency just calculated differently.

So why am I so adamant in defense?  Because the narrative starts off misleading.

Some plays yes.  Some plays no.  Guys miss blocks all the time.  I’d guess it’s much closer to 0% of plays than 100% that all 5 make a block on a given play.  And you know Arch can dodge one on just about any given play.  And versus OSU we had more yards rushing and yards per carry than anyone.   So that doesn’t really compute as to how he screwed that all up.

Ole Miss.  Of their top 5 Olinemen in terms of snap count, two graded lower than Stroh.  You do not get sub-60s by winning every play.  I’m not arguing Stroh is better but rather all the other points.  On any run, that’s at least two guys losing the play.  It didn’t destroy their run game.

 

 

I’ll agree Nick Brooks simply wasn’t ready, full stop. That was a flood disasterclass. Them not moving Cole over was baffling to me. You won’t hear any disagreement on Brooks. 

The missing blocks thing is interesting because in a nut shell, you’re right. But outside zone versus power gap is so much different in what needs to work. When you’re running zone, you have to beat someone to a spot, that’s the name of the game. If you don’t get there, the play is blown up if DL are attacking upfield. Power gap is pretty much just big on big double teams, trying to push DL into LB with pulling guards coming into the hole sometimes. You have a little more forgiveness on power schemes because of how the blocking shakes out. With zone, if you have one mess up, especially on the interior, you are looking at 3-4 yard losses. Stroh’s problem was he was too slow, which allowed for more athletic, attacking DL to cross his face and get into the backfield.

This goes back to, I think, a previous point you’ve made about how sark should have known his personnel better. This is true. At the same time, if someone isn’t built for outside zone, then they’ll fail really spectacularly.

 

[Here for the Wins]

I think we’re kicking butt this year.  Just play our game and the offense will hum along.  Almost time to sit back and enjoy.

[Hookem72]

I think the Brooks experiment started off well in the OU game.   He did pretty well against probably the best DLine we faced all year. 

[Bunk Moreland]

5 hours ago, Joe Zura said:

No not at all stating facts. He was awful as a center like beyond awful he was a beyond mid LG and if you try and tell me I’m wrong you will forever be known as sunshine pumper Howe 😭💀

It’s a hypothetical. Why are you assuming that they are going to start Hutson? And even if they do, he was actually pretty average last year. We can win it all if the rest of the line is above average to elite and our LG is average. Indiana had a few average pieces on its OL, including everybody’s favorite Westlake RG.

[Bunk Moreland]

6 hours ago, Joe Zura said:

@Gerry Hamilton seeing people talk bad about his boy flood on this thread