Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

I know that LB recruiting this cycle has not been great but I feel like there's a lot of recency bias with this. We brought in the top rated LB in the nation last year along with a high 4* and another LB that is getting rave reviews. He also helped bring in one of the top LB from the portal. I think we need to hit the pause button a bit on the panic happening right now due solely to 1 cycle of HS recruiting.

  • Hook 'Em 3
Posted
3 minutes ago, jbseamus83 said:

I know that LB recruiting this cycle has not been great but I feel like there's a lot of recency bias with this. We brought in the top rated LB in the nation last year along with a high 4* and another LB that is getting rave reviews. He also helped bring in one of the top LB from the portal. I think we need to hit the pause button a bit on the panic happening right now due solely to 1 cycle of HS recruiting.

This boards full low football IQ “what have you done for me lately” types. Glad NOBODY on here is apart of the hiring/firing process for coaches here. 

  • Hook 'Em 2
  • Haha 2
Posted (edited)
39 minutes ago, NothinButDaHorns34 said:

This boards full low football IQ “what have you done for me lately” types. Glad NOBODY on here is apart of the hiring/firing process for coaches here. 

 

I remember when I saw post like this about PK.  And then Sark popped him.  I would not be surprised if Sark popped Nansen after the season. 

Edited by MBHORNSFAN
  • Hook 'Em 1
  • Moderators
Posted

Schematically, Nansen should mesh better with Muschamp than he did with PK. More man coverage, more aggressive in general is Nansen’s style. I was hoping Nansen’s arrival would help PK evolve, but it didn’t happen.

  • Hook 'Em 15
Posted
18 minutes ago, Jeff Howe said:

Schematically, Nansen should mesh better with Muschamp than he did with PK. More man coverage, more aggressive in general is Nansen’s style. I was hoping Nansen’s arrival would help PK evolve, but it didn’t happen.

Where does one find good data on blitz rate and man coverage?

What I had seen shows our personnel typically ran man 5-10 percent more in 2025 than 2024.  Yet probably not many dudes would choose 25 over 24.

What percentage of man coverage would you like to see?

Posted
1 hour ago, jbseamus83 said:

I know that LB recruiting this cycle has not been great but I feel like there's a lot of recency bias with this. We brought in the top rated LB in the nation last year along with a high 4* and another LB that is getting rave reviews. He also helped bring in one of the top LB from the portal. I think we need to hit the pause button a bit on the panic happening right now due solely to 1 cycle of HS recruiting.

 I'm not panicked over LB recruiting. My question is more operational - how Nansen and Muschamp work together. 

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.